From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Younger Liu Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:20:05 +0800 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix issue that ocfs2_setattr() does not deal with new_i_size==i_size In-Reply-To: <51CD0BD3.2000306@oracle.com> References: <51CBEFEA.3010308@huawei.com> <51CD0BD3.2000306@oracle.com> Message-ID: <51CE6E85.4080208@huawei.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On 2013/6/28 12:06, Jeff Liu wrote: > Thanks for your patch, it indeed fixed a bug. However, your description > is not correct, please see my inline comments. > > On 06/27/2013 03:55 PM, Younger Liu wrote: > >> The issue scenario is as following: >> 1. fallocate a large disk space(eg. 30G) with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE >> for a file whose i_size and disk size are 512(or other size). >> After executing fallocate, i_size file is still 512, and the disk >> size became to 30G+512? > > The file size won't be changed if FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is specified, > Pls refer to the man page of fallocate(2) for detail. > > Disk size should be changed to reflect this operation, why not? > >> 2. ftruncate the file to new_i_size which equal to inode->i_size. >> After executing ftruncate, disk space does not changes. > > This is a real bug that be fixed in this patch. > >> In other words, i_size file is still 512, and disk size is >> 30G+512. But we want disk size to be 512. > > Ditto. > >> This does not meet our expectations. > > ... > >> >> In order to Solving the issue above, we modified ocfs2_setattr(), >> if attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode), It calls >> ocfs2_truncate_file(), and truncate disk space to attr->ia_size. > > Right. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Younger Liu >> --- >> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 2 +- >> fs/ocfs2/file.c | 7 ++----- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c >> index b8a9d87..19837d4 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c >> @@ -7126,7 +7126,7 @@ int ocfs2_truncate_inline(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, >> if (end > i_size_read(inode)) >> end = i_size_read(inode); >> >> - BUG_ON(start >= end); >> + BUG_ON(start > end); >> >> if (!(OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) || >> !(le16_to_cpu(di->i_dyn_features) & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) || >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c >> index 793c010..2e405e8 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c >> @@ -476,9 +476,6 @@ static int ocfs2_truncate_file(struct inode *inode, >> >> /* lets handle the simple truncate cases before doing any more >> * cluster locking. */ > > Above pointless comments should be removed with this change as well. > >> - if (new_i_size == le64_to_cpu(fe->i_size)) >> - goto bail; >> - >> down_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem); >> >> ocfs2_resv_discard(&osb->osb_la_resmap, >> @@ -1150,14 +1147,14 @@ int ocfs2_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) >> goto bail_unlock_rw; >> } >> >> - if (size_change && attr->ia_size != i_size_read(inode)) { >> + if (size_change) { >> status = inode_newsize_ok(inode, attr->ia_size); >> if (status) >> goto bail_unlock; >> >> inode_dio_wait(inode); >> >> - if (i_size_read(inode) > attr->ia_size) { >> + if (i_size_read(inode) >= attr->ia_size) { >> if (ocfs2_should_order_data(inode)) { >> status = ocfs2_begin_ordered_truncate(inode, >> attr->ia_size); > > > So I also run a quick test to verify this patch, it looks fine. > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/ocfs2/test bs=512 count=1 > 1+0 records in > 1+0 records out > 512 bytes (512 B) copied, 0.000150857 s, 3.4 MB/s > > # xfs_io -c 'falloc -k 512 3G' /ocfs2/test > # ls -l /ocfs2/test > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 Jun 28 11:47 /ocfs2/test > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > .... > /dev/sdb1 8.0G 3.4G 4.7G 42% /ocfs2 > > # xfs_io -c 'truncate 512' /ocfs2/test > > # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > ..... > /dev/sdb1 8.0G 363M 7.7G 5% /ocfs2 > > # ls -l /ocfs2/test > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 512 Jun 28 11:47 /ocfs2/test > > > With above bug description problems were fixed, you can > consider to add: > Reviewed-by: Jie Liu > Tested-by: Jie Liu > > -Jeff > > . > Thanks, I will resent the patch in a moment. Younger