From: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
To: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jens.Lehmann@web.de,
stefan.naewe@atlas-elektronik.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] submodule: add 'exec' option to submodule update
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 21:11:14 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CEA4B2.1090008@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628104243.GD27497@paksenarrion.iveqy.com>
On 28/06/13 22:42, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:53:10PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
>> This allows the user some finer grained control over how the update is
>> done. The primary motivation for this was interoperability with stgit
>> however being able to intercept the submodule update process may prove
>> useful for integrating or extending other tools.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com>
>> --
>> Hi,
>>
>> At $dayjob we have a number of users that are accustomed to using stgit.
>> Stgit doesn't play nicely with git rebase which would be the logical
>> setting for submodule.*.update for our usage. Instead we need to run
>> 'stg rebase --merged' on those submodules that have been initialised
>> with stgit.
>>
>> Our current solution is an in-house script which is a poor substitute
>> for git submodule update. I'd much rather replace our script with git
>> submodule update but we do have a requirement to keep stgit for the
>> foreseeable future. Rather than narrowing in on stgit it seems logical
>> to allow an arbitrary update command to be executed.
>> ---
>> Documentation/git-submodule.txt | 8 +++++++-
>> git-submodule.sh | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> technically it looks fine to me (except for the lack of tests) but I'm
> not sure I follow the use case.
>
> In your case, you want to run a script to determinate if that certain
> submodule should use merge or rebase depending on "whatever". And this
> can't be done with git submodule foreach because you want to know the
> sha1 to update to. Have I understood you correctly?
>
Correct. We tend to have submodules that are just normal detached heads
which we don't usually touch and others that are actively developed
where we would use submodule.x.update=rebase (I personally do) but some
developers want to use stgit on those repositories.
Another approach could be to do a 'git pull --no-recurse-submodule' then
use 'git submodule foreach script-that-does-the-rebase'. The benefit of
the patch I sent is that it can be setup using the config variables[1]
and updated the normal way along with the detached HEADs and those using
plain git branches.
There may be other use-cases for integration with other tools as well
(e.g. something that updates a review tool when commits get rebased).
--
[1] I'm not crazy about the name of submodule.*.update.command but I
couldn't think of a better one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-29 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 9:53 [RFC/PATCH] submodule: add 'exec' option to submodule update Chris Packham
2013-06-28 10:13 ` Stefan Näwe
2013-06-28 10:42 ` Fredrik Gustafsson
2013-06-29 9:11 ` Chris Packham [this message]
2013-06-30 15:30 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-07-01 9:21 ` Chris Packham
2013-07-01 10:11 ` [RFC/PATCHv2] submodule: add ability to configure update command Chris Packham
2013-07-01 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-02 10:12 ` [RFC/PATCHv3] submodule update: allow custom " Chris Packham
2013-07-02 16:56 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-07-02 23:26 ` Chris Packham
2013-07-03 6:55 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-07-03 7:54 ` Chris Packham
2013-07-03 8:50 ` Chris Packham
2013-07-03 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-03 9:02 ` [RFC/PATCHv4] " Chris Packham
2013-07-03 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-01 16:48 ` [RFC/PATCHv2] submodule: add ability to configure " Junio C Hamano
2013-07-02 9:59 ` Chris Packham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CEA4B2.1090008@gmail.com \
--to=judge.packham@gmail.com \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iveqy@iveqy.com \
--cc=stefan.naewe@atlas-elektronik.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.