From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Zhang Hang <bob.zhanghang@huawei.com>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix cpu utilization account error
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:20:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D24708.1060206@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D16777.5000703@huawei.com>
Hi, Xie
On 07/01/2013 07:26 PM, Xie XiuQi wrote:
[snip]
> Here is the kthread main logic. Although it's not a good idea, but it does
> exist:
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> /* call schedule every 1 sec */
> if (HZ <= jiffies - last) {
> last = jiffies;
> schedule();
> }
>
> /* get data and sent it */
> get_msg();
> send_msg();
What about use cond_resched() here? Isn't that more gentle?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> if (kthread_should_stop())
> break;
> }
>
>> That said, accounting funnies induced by skipped update are possible,
>> which could trump the cycle savings I suppose, so maybe savings (sniff)
>> should just go away?
>
> Indeed, removing the skip_clock_update could resolve the issue, but I found
> there is no this issue in preempt mode. However, if remove skip_clock_update
> we'll get more precise time account.
>
> So, what's your opinion, Mike.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-01 6:45 [PATCH] sched: fix cpu utilization account error Xie XiuQi
2013-07-01 7:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-01 11:26 ` Xie XiuQi
2013-07-01 11:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 3:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-02 4:11 ` Xie XiuQi
2013-07-02 3:20 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-07-02 4:15 ` Xie XiuQi
2013-07-01 15:19 ` Greg KH
2013-07-02 1:41 ` Xie XiuQi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D24708.1060206@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bob.zhanghang@huawei.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.