From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: bobooscar <bobooscar@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Which part of qemu responds to ACPI control method?
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:57:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D2F86D.8080000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ibb9rhw3lt7fpd4j4o0wfkvp.1372770327702@email.android.com>
On 07/02/13 15:05, bobooscar wrote:
>
> Hi,all:
> When a guest domain excutes a control method, such as “_PTS”, which
> part of qemu would respond and handle the request? thank you in advance.
IMHO, like any other method, _PTS (Prepare To Sleep) is executed by the
guest's ACPI interpreter, and qemu responds only to the hardware
accesses that the method makes.
Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 13:05 [Qemu-devel] Which part of qemu responds to ACPI control method? bobooscar
2013-07-02 15:57 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D2F86D.8080000@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=bobooscar@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.