From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Jean-Pierre Tosoni <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:05:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D3167D.3070000@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000101ce774b$3925e380$ab71aa80$@acksys.fr>
On 2013-07-02 7:40 PM, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Sorry to use your time again...
>
>> But much more important than that is to not cause regressions for other
>> people via aggressive packet dropping.
>
> Agreed, but see below.
>
>> If you put the code in minstrel (and minstrel_ht), it not only allows
>> making a better tradeoff for retry handling, the code also doesn't have
>> to be run for every single packet. You can run it during the rate
>> control stats update.
>
> OK, I'll have a look at that part now.
>
>>
>> The reduction of retry attempts definitely needs to be balanced
>> properly. Retries with max_prob_rate can be more important than retries
>> with max_tp_rate, but there needs to be a minimum for each of those.
>
> This leads to a question about regressions and backward compatibility:
>
> Since minstrel can compute as much as 28 retries for a frame,
> And since the (standard) default value for "short_frame_max_tx_count" is 7,
>
> ... there is no way I can enforce the configured value while keeping
> minstrel counts by default !
> The standard itself gives a very aggressive limit! Or am I mistaken about
> the significance of this configuration parameter ?
I think you're right about this. Specifically because the standard limit
is much lower than what is being used now, we need to really make sure
that it's applied in a way that it does not harm the normal use case in
any visible way.
- Felix
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 16:40 [RFC v2] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-06-29 20:08 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-01 8:34 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-01 9:04 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-02 13:28 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 13:50 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-02 17:40 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-07-02 18:05 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D3167D.3070000@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.