From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>,
chris.mason@fusionio.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: avoid memory leak in btrfs_close_devices
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:01:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D3B02A.5080500@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C994D5.3070509@gmail.com>
further, you need to free device->label as well.
----
static int device_list_add(const char *path,
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super,
u64 devid, struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret)
{
::
device->label = kstrdup(disk_super->label, GFP_NOFS);
----
disk_super->label is never null when disk_super is not null
since its inline allocation. and kstrdup does len = strlen(s) + 1;
which looks like device->label is never NULL, but I havn't traced
down kmalloc_track_caller until to its end
-----
22 char *kstrdup(const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
23 {
24 size_t len;
25 char *buf;
26
27 if (!s)
28 return NULL;
29
30 len = strlen(s) + 1;
31 buf = kmalloc_track_caller(len, gfp);
32 if (buf)
33 memcpy(buf, s, len);
34 return buf;
35 }
----------
Thanks, Anand
On 06/25/2013 09:02 PM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> Three kind of structures need to be freed on close:
> * All struct btrfs_device managed by fs_devices
> * The name field for each struct btrfs_device
> * The above items for seed_devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
> ---
> volumes.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
> index d6f81f8..257b740 100644
> --- a/volumes.c
> +++ b/volumes.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,16 @@ static int device_list_add(const char *path,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void btrfs_close_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
> +{
> + close(device->fd);
> + device->fd = -1;
> + device->writeable = 0;
> + if (device->name)
> + kfree(device->name);
> + kfree(device);
> +}
> +
> int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_devices *seed_devices;
> @@ -161,17 +171,17 @@ int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices
> *fs_devices)
> again:
> list_for_each(cur, &fs_devices->devices) {
> device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> - close(device->fd);
> - device->fd = -1;
> - device->writeable = 0;
> + btrfs_close_device(device);
> }
>
> seed_devices = fs_devices->seed;
> fs_devices->seed = NULL;
> if (seed_devices) {
> + kfree(fs_devices);
> fs_devices = seed_devices;
> goto again;
> }
> + kfree(fs_devices);
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 13:02 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: avoid memory leak in btrfs_close_devices Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-07-02 16:39 ` David Sterba
2013-07-03 5:01 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2013-07-03 5:48 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D3B02A.5080500@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shhuiw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.