Re: [PATCH][v2] powerpc/85xx: Move ePAPR paravirt initialization earlier

[Tudor Laurentiu <Laurentiu.Tudor@freescale.com>]

On 07/03/2013 05:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 07:29:43 AM, Tudor Laurentiu wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 08:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 07:46:29 AM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>>>> - insts = of_get_property(hyper_node, "hcall-instructions", &len);
>>>> - if (!insts)
>>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)
>>>> + if (of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "has-idle", NULL))
>>>> + ppc_md.power_save = epapr_ev_idle;
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Why are you doing this before processing hcall-instructions?
>>>
>>
>> Nothing of importance. The code seemed more clear to me.
>
> It seems wrong to expose epapr_ev_idle to ppc_md before the hcall has
> been patched in, even if you don't expect to actually go idle at this
> point.
>

Ah, now I understand your concerns. I've submitted a [v3] restoring the 
original ordering.

---
Best Regards, Laurentiu