From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joonyoung Shim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/cma: use prime helpers instead GEM CMA specific dma_buf functionality Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:14:05 +0900 Message-ID: <51D520BD.8010105@samsung.com> References: <51CD1E1B.2020403@samsung.com> <171613676.bYSyJq1iqA@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E9EE6663 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 00:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from epcpsbgr2.samsung.com (u142.gpu120.samsung.co.kr [203.254.230.142]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MPE00ERWHF4DWG0@mailout1.samsung.com> for dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 16:13:58 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: <171613676.bYSyJq1iqA@avalon> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Joonyoung, > > Thank you for the patches. > > On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is the second version patchset. >> >> GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for >> dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit >> 89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so >> this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to >> using prime helpers. >> >> >> To Laurent, >> >> It is merged a patch to cache mapping from DRM Prime, can this patchset >> get your ack? > There you go (and sorry for the late reply) > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > > By the way, between the initial version of the GEM CMA PRIME patch and the > version that got merged in v3.10, commit > 011c2282c74db120f01a8414edc66c3f217f5511 ("drm: prime: fix refcounting on the > dmabuf import error path") was introduced. The GEM CMA PRIME code in v3.10 > thus has a refcounting bug :-( > > Should this patch set go to -stable, or should we cook up a special fix ? I'm not sure it's better to choose which way. Dave, how we should do about that problem?