From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx13.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.18]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r64HM28W032369 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:22:02 -0400 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r64HLv9i026488 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:21:59 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (bon31-1-82-66-78-161.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.78.161]) (Authenticated sender: georges.giralt) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 208374C8038 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:21:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51D5AF30.3040004@free.fr> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 19:21:52 +0200 From: Georges Giralt MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <694672986.201875226.1372861755810.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7.priv.proxad.net> <1372877653.37850.YahooMailNeo@web181502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51D5384B.3070503@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51D5384B.3070503@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Resising underlying array Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hello ! Today was a terrible day at work. So I did not touch my array nor LVM. But I thought about it. As I will resize the first disk partition, I'll touch the beginning of=20 the PV (which is built on the mirror made of the second disk partitions). So I wonder if LVM is "dumb" and won't notice that the first blocks are=20 not the old first blocks (provided that the underlying array is synced),=20 or if the LVM layer will loudly complain because the former blocks of=20 the beginning of the PV have moved (Am I right or wrong here ??) ??? I've to admit that I'm reluctant to touch this server, given the day I=20 had today... So I beg, another time, for your advice. Thanks for your help ! Le 04/07/2013 10:54, Bryn M. Reeves a =EF=BF=BDcrit : > On 07/03/2013 07:54 PM, matthew patton wrote: >>> 200 MB for /boot was sensible years ago but now is a joke. >> since when? All you need is 2 kernels. Have Linux 3.x kernels gotten >> out of hand? I only use RHEL/Centos5 and 6 and I've never even come >> close to running out. > It partly depends on the distro and features you use - e.g. Fedora has > preupgrade which uses /boot as temporary storage. This requires > considerably more space than was required in the past (if you are going > to use the feature - otherwise, carry on regardless :). > > Regards, > Bryn. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > --=20 If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a n= ail. Abraham Maslow A British variant : Any tool can serve as a hammer but a screwdriver makes the best chisel.