All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Chandramouleeswaran,
	Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>, "Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] SELinux: Reduce overhead of mls_level_isvalid() function call
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:10:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D6FE08.8030904@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B70EE4.5030209@tycho.nsa.gov>

On 06/11/2013 07:49 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 01:55 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v4->v5:
>>    - Fix scripts/checkpatch.pl warning.
>>
>> v3->v4:
>>    - Merge the 2 separate while loops in ebitmap_contains() into
>>      a single one.
>>
>> v2->v3:
>>    - Remove unused local variables i, node from mls_level_isvalid().
>>
>> v1->v2:
>>   - Move the new ebitmap comparison logic from mls_level_isvalid()
>>     into the ebitmap_contains() helper function.
>>   - Rerun perf and performance tests on the latest v3.10-rc4 kernel.
>>
>> While running the high_systime workload of the AIM7 benchmark on
>> a 2-socket 12-core Westmere x86-64 machine running 3.10-rc4 kernel
>> (with HT on), it was found that a pretty sizable amount of time was
>> spent in the SELinux code. Below was the perf trace of the "perf
>> record -a -s" of a test run at 1500 users:
>>
>>    5.04%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_get_bit
>>    1.96%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] mls_level_isvalid
>>    1.95%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] find_next_bit
>>
>> The ebitmap_get_bit() was the hottest function in the perf-report
>> output.  Both the ebitmap_get_bit() and find_next_bit() functions
>> were, in fact, called by mls_level_isvalid(). As a result, the
>> mls_level_isvalid() call consumed 8.95% of the total CPU time of
>> all the 24 virtual CPUs which is quite a lot. The majority of the
>> mls_level_isvalid() function invocations come from the socket creation
>> system call.
>>
>> Looking at the mls_level_isvalid() function, it is checking to see
>> if all the bits set in one of the ebitmap structure are also set in
>> another one as well as the highest set bit is no bigger than the one
>> specified by the given policydb data structure. It is doing it in
>> a bit-by-bit manner. So if the ebitmap structure has many bits set,
>> the iteration loop will be done many times.
>>
>> The current code can be rewritten to use a similar algorithm as the
>> ebitmap_contains() function with an additional check for the
>> highest set bit. The ebitmap_contains() function was extended to
>> cover an optional additional check for the highest set bit, and the
>> mls_level_isvalid() function was modified to call ebitmap_contains().
>>
>> With that change, the perf trace showed that the used CPU time drop
>> down to just 0.08% (ebitmap_contains + mls_level_isvalid) of the
>> total which is about 100X less than before.
>>
>>    0.07%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_contains
>>    0.05%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_get_bit
>>    0.01%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] mls_level_isvalid
>>    0.01%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] find_next_bit
>>
>> The remaining ebitmap_get_bit() and find_next_bit() functions calls
>> are made by other kernel routines as the new mls_level_isvalid()
>> function will not call them anymore.
>>
>> This patch also improves the high_systime AIM7 benchmark result,
>> though the improvement is not as impressive as is suggested by the
>> reduction in CPU time spent in the ebitmap functions. The table below
>> shows the performance change on the 2-socket x86-64 system (with HT
>> on) mentioned above.
>>
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> |   Workload   | mean % change | mean % change  | mean % change   |
>> |              | 10-100 users  | 200-1000 users | 1100-2000 users |
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> | high_systime |     +0.1%     |     +0.9%      |     +2.6%       |
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
>
> Acked-by:  Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
>

Thank for the Ack. Will that patch go into v3.11?

Regards,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-05 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 17:55 [PATCH 1/2 v5] SELinux: Reduce overhead of mls_level_isvalid() function call Waiman Long
2013-06-11 11:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2013-07-05 17:10   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2013-07-08 14:09     ` Stephen Smalley
2013-07-08 16:30     ` Paul Moore
2013-07-08 16:30       ` Paul Moore
2013-07-08 20:05       ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D6FE08.8030904@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.