Re: [Webhob] Deployed or Included?

[Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>]

On 07/08/2013 11:09 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> I am looking at the table of packages that will be part of Web Hob. That
> table will list all packages built during a certain build.

What table are you making a reference to?   I didn't see a pointer in the e-mail.

>
> Not all the packages in that table ended up in the final image. To
> differentiate them, there will be a column that will tell you if a package
> is in the final image or isn't. How should that column be called:
> Deployed? Included? Something else?

There is a distinct possibility that the number of packages built to support the webhob that go on the final target image is zero, particularly in the case that you just need a particular configuration of busybox + a kernel.

Without seeing your table it is hard to say, but generally we have nativesdk, native, cross and target packages.  I would have imagined you can just specify if something is in the target image or not.  There certainly are target packages that get built but not installed to the image, and for these we just use the term installed to sysroot vs installed to image.

Jason.