From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwSRu-0003Sj-Ni for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:34:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwSRt-0007Kc-Fl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:34:58 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:58154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwSRt-0007GT-91 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:34:57 -0400 Message-ID: <51DBBD18.4050200@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:34:48 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130708034128.GA20623@morn.localdomain> <51DB2DDC.3080001@redhat.com> <20130708231832.GA30361@morn.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20130708231832.GA30361@morn.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] seabios 1.7.3 breaks booting windows 7? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin O'Connor Cc: seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Cole Robinson 09.07.2013 03:18, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:23:40PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> On 07/07/2013 11:41 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >>> The 1.7.3 version of SeaBIOS has now been released. For more >>> information on the release, please see: >> >> Just gave it a spin, breaks booting a Windows 7 VM for me. Using qemu-1.4.2 >> from Fedora 19 as well as qemu.git. >> >> Here's the BSOD (F19 qemu and seabios 1.7.3): >> http://crobinso.fedorapeople.org/misc/seabios_1.7.3_windows_err.png Hmm. Works for me with qemu-kvm-1.1 and qemu-1.5 just fine, with a few different windows VMs (32/64 bits, smp/up, win7/win2008). But I haven't tried every possible cpu/smp combination. > Thanks for testing. I have a "Windows 7 Ultimate" beta (build 7100) > that I tested with and I don't see this problem. (Nor do I see the > problem on WinXP.) > > Can you try without smp and with a smaller memory size (eg, 512M) to > see if the behavior changes. > > Otherwise, we'll need to iterate through each change in the 76e58028 > commit and find out which part of the DSDT that your copy of Windows > doesn't like. Thanks, /mjt