From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] AP Limitation because of ATH9K_HTC_MAX_STA
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBD921.3040704@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DBD55B.2010204@openwrt.org>
Am 09.07.2013 11:18, schrieb Felix Fietkau:
> On 2013-07-09 10:50 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> How replacing AP with about MESH or AdHock+BATMAN?
> Why? That sounds like a recipe for disaster to me (at least for
> conference networks). The ath9k_htc stuff can't handle more peers in
> mesh/ad-hoc than clients in AP mode.
> In setting up a conference network, you have to think about what the
> primary bottleneck is. When using consumer APs, the bottleneck isn't
> CPU/RAM, it's usually limited channel airtime!
>
> - Felix
>
Not with ath9k_htc. AdHock+BATMAN can be split in different groups on
different channels. ath9k_htc can be used as STA to primer AP and
second interface on some laptops. But sure -- it is worst case scenario
with no extra cost.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 8:35 [ath9k-devel] AP Limitation because of ATH9K_HTC_MAX_STA David Jardin
2013-07-08 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-07-09 8:46 ` David Jardin
2013-07-09 8:50 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-07-09 9:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-09 9:34 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2013-07-09 9:52 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-07-09 11:23 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-20 18:44 ` Gustavo
2013-11-20 18:58 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-20 19:01 ` Gustavo Azambuja
2013-11-22 10:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 14:40 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-22 14:47 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 15:00 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-22 15:02 ` Oleksij Rempel
2013-11-22 15:10 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-25 10:52 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 11:45 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-25 12:02 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 19:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-25 19:28 ` Ben Greear
2013-11-25 20:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-11-26 7:24 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-26 8:18 ` Adrian Chadd
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-22 15:33 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-23 1:35 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-25 11:27 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-25 11:57 ` Alex Hacker
2013-11-25 11:41 Trevor Cullen
2013-11-25 11:41 ` Sujith Manoharan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBD921.3040704@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.