From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Platform Framebuffers and SimpleDRM
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:02:56 -0600
Message-ID: <51DC7A80.9030201@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1372940714-12470-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1372940714-12470-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 07/04/2013 06:25 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> This series changes the way we handle firmware framebuffers on x86 systems. On
> other architectures the recently introduced "simple-framebuffer"
> platform-devices provide a sane and proper way to handle firmware framebuffers.
> So why not use it on x86, too?

Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

(This time I didn't see any issue with the FB content being blank; I
must have forgotten a console= command-line parameter or something the
last time around)