From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] extcon: palmas: Option to disable ID/VBUS detection based on platform Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:38:11 +0530 Message-ID: <51DE219B.7000109@nvidia.com> References: <1373448546-7531-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <51DE1B99.6090403@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51DE1B99.6090403@samsung.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "rob@landley.net" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kishon@ti.com" , "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 11 July 2013 08:12 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Laxman, > >> static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> @@ -137,20 +140,26 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct palmas_usb *palmas_usb; >> int status; >> >> - if (node && !pdata) { >> - pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); >> - >> - if (!pdata) >> - return -ENOMEM; >> + palmas_usb = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*palmas_usb), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!palmas_usb) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> >> - pdata->wakeup = of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,wakeup"); >> + if (node && !pdata) { >> + palmas_usb->wakeup = of_property_read_bool(node, "ti,wakeup"); >> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = of_property_read_bool(node, >> + "ti,enable-id-detection"); >> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = of_property_read_bool(node, >> + "ti,enable-vbus-detection"); >> + } else if (pdata) { >> + palmas_usb->wakeup = pdata->wakeup; >> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = true; >> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = true; >> } else if (!pdata) { >> - return -EINVAL; >> + palmas_usb->wakeup = true; >> + palmas_usb->enable_id_detection = true; >> + palmas_usb->enable_vbus_detection = true; >> } > I think we could modify it as following patch to remove duplicate line. > If you agree about below modification, I will apply your patch with following patch. > I am fine with this and this looks simple and straight. I have seen some patches/discussion from TI to remove the platform data support at all and hence removing from here in future will be very simple.