diff for duplicates of <51DE6E87.5050201@nvidia.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 02459c5..7a05372 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ On 07/11/2013 02:12 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
 >>> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,
 >>> the driver can handle the interrupt.
 >>>
->>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
+>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
 >>> ---
 >>>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c |   77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 >>>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
@@ -100,21 +100,21 @@ Yes, it should be a separate patch, I will do it.
 >>> +
 >>> +	lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
 >>> +
->>> +	if (data->kind == max6696)
+>>> +	if (data->kind = max6696)
 >>> +		lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms_max6696);
 >>> +
->>> +	if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms_max6696 & 0xfe) == 0) {
+>>> +	if ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (alarms_max6696 & 0xfe) = 0) {
 >>> +		return IRQ_NONE;
 >>
 >> For non-MAX6696 chips this will evaluate to:
 >>
->> 	if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (0 & 0xfe) == 0)
+>> 	if ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (0 & 0xfe) = 0)
 >>
 >> and therefore be true for any value of "alarms" and therefore always
 >> result in IRQ_NONE being returned.
 >>
 > Not really. If
-> 	(alarms & 0xfe) == 0
+> 	(alarms & 0xfe) = 0
 > returns false (ie thee is an alarm) the expression is false and the
 > if statement won't be executed. Or maybe I didn't get enough sleep
 > last night ;).
@@ -133,4 +133,10 @@ Yes, it should be a separate patch, I will do it.
 > 
 >> Thierry
 > 
->
+> 
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+lm-sensors mailing list
+lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
+http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ccd7fa9..d9cf8d4 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
  "ref\020130710170552.GA15665@dhcp-172-17-186-34.nvidia.com\0"
  "ref\020130710181248.GA22430@roeck-us.net\0"
  "ref\020130710181248.GA22430-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ.\0"
- "Date\0Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:36:23 +0800\0"
+ "From\0Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ.\0"
+ "Date\0Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:36:23 +0000\0"
  "To\0Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>"
   khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
  ">>> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,\n"
  ">>> the driver can handle the interrupt.\n"
  ">>>\n"
- ">>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ ">>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>\n"
  ">>> ---\n"
  ">>>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c |   77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------\n"
  ">>>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)\n"
@@ -117,21 +117,21 @@
  ">>> +\n"
  ">>> +\tlm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);\n"
  ">>> +\n"
- ">>> +\tif (data->kind == max6696)\n"
+ ">>> +\tif (data->kind = max6696)\n"
  ">>> +\t\tlm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms_max6696);\n"
  ">>> +\n"
- ">>> +\tif ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms_max6696 & 0xfe) == 0) {\n"
+ ">>> +\tif ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (alarms_max6696 & 0xfe) = 0) {\n"
  ">>> +\t\treturn IRQ_NONE;\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> For non-MAX6696 chips this will evaluate to:\n"
  ">>\n"
- ">> \tif ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (0 & 0xfe) == 0)\n"
+ ">> \tif ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (0 & 0xfe) = 0)\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> and therefore be true for any value of \"alarms\" and therefore always\n"
  ">> result in IRQ_NONE being returned.\n"
  ">>\n"
  "> Not really. If\n"
- "> \t(alarms & 0xfe) == 0\n"
+ "> \t(alarms & 0xfe) = 0\n"
  "> returns false (ie thee is an alarm) the expression is false and the\n"
  "> if statement won't be executed. Or maybe I didn't get enough sleep\n"
  "> last night ;).\n"
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@
  "> \n"
  ">> Thierry\n"
  "> \n"
- >
+ "> \n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
+ "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
+ http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
 
-4d1d119862c18530e39b1a6cf43f01698c229e01e07df89b8d6edefd7d4f9302
+5b8268c658c109fca30f7936b21b2e31f599081968e95813e5c21dac691b025a
