Re: interested in py80211?

["Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>]

On 07/12/13 10:02, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Yep, I'd totally be interested. Not that I don't have enough things on
> my plate already ;-)
>
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 22:57 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> A common say in Linux arena is "when you have an itch, just scratch it".
>
> :-)
>
>> My itch is that tools like ifconfig and iw are great, but in an
>> automated test environment it kind of sucks to parse output, which is
>> confirmed by blurb from iw: "Do NOT screenscrape this tool, we don't
>> consider its output stable.".
>
> Heh, yeah ...
>
>> Ever since my first contact with Python I tend to favor it over other
>> scripting alternatives so I decided to scratch my itch with that and
>> another old acquaintance called SWIG. With those I went to create
>> py80211. A first attempt was to have SWIG create a wrapper API directly
>> exposing the libnl-3 API, but that did not feel comfortable in a
>> scripting environment. So the level of abstraction is a bit higher. It
>> is just in a kick-off state (eg. can only send u32 attributes), but I
>> decided to push it to github anyway.
>
> Another approach might be exposing the libnl APIs and then build a
> higher-level library in python. Have you considered that? That might
> make it useful to other users of netlink as well, while keeping a 'nice'
> nl80211 API?

I am still at that fork in the road and not sure about it. The libnl 
project itself already has libnl stuff exposed in a python lib being the 
core api and route. So I could go and add genl support to that and build 
the high-level python library from there.

Regards,
Arend