All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] spi/xilinx: Simplify irq allocation
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E00BF8.2020608@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130708162642.GM27646@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2154 bytes --]

On 07/08/2013 06:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:48:14PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 04:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Is it definitely safe to leave the IRQ hanging around after the master
>>> has been freed - there's no possibility of a late error interrupt or
>>> something?
> 
>> I think it is more generic question if this race condition is fine
>> for all drivers which are using devres groups.
> 
> Well, it's mainly an issue for IRQs - the other resources don't initiate
> events by themselves which is what causes the issue.  It just needs a
> bit of extra care so I wanted to check that this has been thought of.
> 
>> I have just looked at it and devres_release_all() is called where
>> driver is unload and irq are disabled there.
> 
> The problem is the gap between the resources used to handle the IRQ
> being freed and the IRQ itself being freed - if the hardware can be
> guaranteed to be idle then that's fine but we need to be sure that is
> OK.  Otherwise the interrupt handler may get run and be looking at a
> resource which was freed which would be unfortunate.
> 
>> btw: What's the proper way for spi driver unregistration?
> 
>> spi_unregistered_master() (which also free private structure)
>> and
>> spi_master_put()?
> 
> Yes.

Just a follow up on this.
Which function free private structures registered by spi_alloc_master function?
Is it in spi_master_put()?

The reason why I am asking is where clk_xx functions should be added.
I see them between these two functions in sifr for example.

And also I see in drivers in error probe path that drivers are calling kfree(master)
but they are not doing in remove part (like spi-davinci.c).

I just want to clear this in our zynq drivers before we send them out.

Thanks,
Michal




-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-08 13:29 [PATCH v1 1/4] spi/xilinx: Remove CONFIG_OF from the driver Michal Simek
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] spi/xilinx: Clean ioremap calling Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:50   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] spi/xilinx: Simplify irq allocation Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:49   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 15:48     ` Michal Simek
2013-07-08 16:26       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09 14:15         ` Michal Simek
2013-07-09 14:47           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09 14:53             ` Michal Simek
2013-07-12 14:00         ` Michal Simek [this message]
2013-08-22 13:10           ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 13:29 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] spi/xilinx: Use of_property_read_u32 for reading value from node Michal Simek
2013-07-08 14:51   ` Mark Brown
2013-07-09  5:26     ` Michal Simek
2013-07-09  9:14       ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 14:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] spi/xilinx: Remove CONFIG_OF from the driver Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E00BF8.2020608@monstr.eu \
    --to=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.