All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:27:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E0123D.2000203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712094029.GB2533@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1899 bytes --]

On 07/12/2013 03:40 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:

>>> +
>>> +{ 'command': 'blockdev-add', 'data': { 'options': 'BlockOptions' } }
>>
>> Sounds nice - and seems like it should be easy enough to extend BlockRef
>> and/or BlockOptions to have a way to pass an fd even for backing files,
>> getting to (my) end goal of using fd passing to get SELinux labeling for
>> NFS files out of the box from libvirt.
> 
> In fact, I think it might be a schema-only patch at this point. :-)
> 
>> Should this command return anything?  For example, returning a
>> BlockDeviceInfo (with its recursive listing of the entire backing chain)
>> might be useful to check that qemu's view of the world matches what the
>> caller passed in.  Particularly important if we are able to let the user
>> choose whether to pass the full chain or to just pass the top-most image
>> and let qemu chase down the metadata in that image to open additional
>> files for the rest of the chain.
> 
> Does it matter for you to have this immediately as a return value from
> blockdev-add, or wouldn't a following query-block on this device achieve
> the same?

Yeah, that will probably work.  We have a couple *-add that return
useful values, but that was so we didn't have to introduce a separate
query at the time.  But here, we already have the query, and for a
deeply nested struct, that's a lot of information to generate for
callers that don't care, and callers that do care can do a double call.

> 
> I'm not against adding a return value when it's useful, but I don't think
> we should just return arbitrary query-* results if we can't think of
> anything else to return.

It should always be possible to upgrade from {} to actual struct
contents in a later release, should the need arise.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09  9:53 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] qapi-types.py: Split off generate_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:45   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/11] qapi-types.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:57   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:46     ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/11] qapi-visit.py: Split off generate_visit_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:18   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/11] qapi-visit.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:21   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/11] qapi: Add visitor for implicit structs Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:41   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:51     ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] qapi: Flat unions with arbitrary discriminator Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 14:16   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/11] qapi: Add consume argument to qmp_input_get_object() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:17   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] qapi: Anonymous unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:47   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12  8:55     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:15       ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] Implement qdict_flatten() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 20:25   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-16  8:59     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/11] block: Allow "driver" option on the top level Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:30   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:45   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12  9:40     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:27       ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-07-12  9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-12 10:53   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E0123D.2000203@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.