From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial: mxs: remove the unused macro Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:30:27 +0800 Message-ID: <51E3B323.1070606@freescale.com> References: <1373857736-30108-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20130715082044.GL12139@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from co9ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.25]:55457 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754463Ab3GOI0X convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:26:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130715082044.GL12139@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?VXdlIEtsZWluZS1Lw7ZuaWc=?= Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B407=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5 16:20, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6= nig =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > You're suggesting that MXS_AUART_DMA_CONFIG was set here unconditiona= lly > before and so the check in the hunk above is not necessary anymore. yes, that's what i want to say. > (So your "not used any more" is technically wrong.) ok, I will change this comment. thanks Huang Shijie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:30:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] serial: mxs: remove the unused macro In-Reply-To: <20130715082044.GL12139@pengutronix.de> References: <1373857736-30108-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20130715082044.GL12139@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <51E3B323.1070606@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? 2013?07?15? 16:20, Uwe Kleine-K?nig ??: > You're suggesting that MXS_AUART_DMA_CONFIG was set here unconditionally > before and so the check in the hunk above is not necessary anymore. yes, that's what i want to say. > (So your "not used any more" is technically wrong.) ok, I will change this comment. thanks Huang Shijie