diff for duplicates of <51E3D499.3060902@freescale.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 8e49334..d0e69f1 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-于 2013年07月15日 17:07, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
+? 2013?07?15? 17:07, Uwe Kleine-K?nig ??:
 > Hello,
 >
 > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:41:25PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
->> 于 2013年07月15日 16:27, Uwe Kleine-König 写道:
+>> ? 2013?07?15? 16:27, Uwe Kleine-K?nig ??:
 >>> do you want to say that the driver fails to only enable DMA when RTS/CTS
 >>> are available; or that today the driver can handle DMA just fine even
 >>> without RTS/CTS? I interpret your commit log as the latter, your patch
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ This patch depends on the first patch. :)
 > 	reliable without hardware handshaking. So make DMA dependant on
 > 	a newly introdused property "fsl,uart-has-rtscts".
 >
-> 	Cc: stable@kernel.org # [first affected version]
+> 	Cc: stable at kernel.org # [first affected version]
 >
 > The flag is only used to decide if dma should be enabled. So I think an
 > in-code comment would be nice, too. Is it still correct to set
@@ -67,10 +67,3 @@ Huang Shijie
 > Best regards
 > Uwe
 >
-
-
-
-_______________________________________________
-linux-arm-kernel mailing list
-linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9b3f9cd..d8155ba 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,21 +3,17 @@
  "ref\020130715082716.GM12139@pengutronix.de\0"
  "ref\051E3B5B5.1030706@freescale.com\0"
  "ref\020130715090755.GN12139@pengutronix.de\0"
- "From\0Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] serial: mxs: enable the DMA only when the rts/cts is enabled\0"
+ "From\0b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 2/3] serial: mxs: enable the DMA only when the rts/cts is enabled\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:53:13 +0800\0"
- "To\0Uwe Kleine-K\303\266nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>\0"
- "Cc\0gregkh@linuxfoundation.org"
-  shawn.guo@linaro.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
- " linux-serial@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "\344\272\216 2013\345\271\26407\346\234\21015\346\227\245 17:07, Uwe Kleine-K\303\266nig \345\206\231\351\201\223:\n"
+ "? 2013?07?15? 17:07, Uwe Kleine-K?nig ??:\n"
  "> Hello,\n"
  ">\n"
  "> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:41:25PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:\n"
- ">> \344\272\216 2013\345\271\26407\346\234\21015\346\227\245 16:27, Uwe Kleine-K\303\266nig \345\206\231\351\201\223:\n"
+ ">> ? 2013?07?15? 16:27, Uwe Kleine-K?nig ??:\n"
  ">>> do you want to say that the driver fails to only enable DMA when RTS/CTS\n"
  ">>> are available; or that today the driver can handle DMA just fine even\n"
  ">>> without RTS/CTS? I interpret your commit log as the latter, your patch\n"
@@ -39,7 +35,7 @@
  "> \treliable without hardware handshaking. So make DMA dependant on\n"
  "> \ta newly introdused property \"fsl,uart-has-rtscts\".\n"
  ">\n"
- "> \tCc: stable@kernel.org # [first affected version]\n"
+ "> \tCc: stable at kernel.org # [first affected version]\n"
  ">\n"
  "> The flag is only used to decide if dma should be enabled. So I think an\n"
  "> in-code comment would be nice, too. Is it still correct to set\n"
@@ -81,13 +77,6 @@
  ">\n"
  "> Best regards\n"
  "> Uwe\n"
- ">\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n"
- "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
+ >
 
-c80fad30e1ec1a96c85436adc69aae6f62481a000b7381373ea888da50d8e233
+188f03b1ca6ca116dbc7bb3af74f5e5b6d41457111a5d341cddc16bc32198130
