From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Add support for querying DMA capabilities
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:07:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E50D3B.2050207@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130715195145.GB11538@sirena.org.uk>
On 07/15/2013 09:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 07/15/2013 07:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:27:21PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
>>> Right, we probably want to set an artificial floor here but it still
>>> seems like we should be checking that the device actually supports this.
>>> If the hardware can only support 64 bytes then the above code won't work
>>> properly.
>
>> It shouldn't be to hard to extend the dma_caps API with a
>> min_sg_len. But is this something you've actually seen in existing
>> hardware for that the driver would make use of the dmaengine PCM
>> framework? If it is more of theoretical nature we can still easily
>> add it later if it becomes necessary.
>
> I'm not aware of anything but equally well I made zero effort to look
> and note that quite a few existing drivers appear to have minimum values
> quite a bit above 16 though I doubt they are all actual restrictions.
I would assume that most of them don't express hardware limitations but
rather are sensible lower limits which allow operation without
over-/underruns. But that's something that doesn't necessarily depend on the
DMA controller, but rather on the system as a whole, e.g. on a slower
machine you'd typically set the limit higher so the CPU has a better chance
to keep up. So this isn't something you'd want to set in the DMA controller
driver. But I'm not sure if there is a good way to calculate a sensible
minimum buffer size based on the whole system's constraints.
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 16:42 [RFC 1/2] ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Add support for querying DMA capabilities Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-15 16:42 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-15 16:42 ` [RFC 2/2] ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Provide default config Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-15 17:26 ` [RFC 1/2] ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Add support for querying DMA capabilities Mark Brown
2013-07-15 16:57 ` Vinod Koul
2013-07-15 17:57 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-15 17:57 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-15 18:20 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-15 19:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-15 19:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-16 9:07 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2013-07-16 10:03 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-16 10:03 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E50D3B.2050207@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.