From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
bhelgaas@google.com,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: workqueue, pci: INFO: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:11:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E55B7D.2040209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
I have been seeing this warning every time during boot. I haven't
spent time digging through it though... Please let me know if
any machine-specific info is needed.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
----------------------------------------------------
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.11.0-rc1-lockdep-fix-a #6 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
kworker/0:1/142 is trying to acquire lock:
((&wfc.work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81077100>] flush_work+0x0/0xb0
but task is already holding lock:
((&wfc.work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075dd9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x610
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock((&wfc.work));
lock((&wfc.work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by kworker/0:1/142:
#0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81075dd9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x610
#1: ((&wfc.work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075dd9>] process_one_work+0x169/0x610
#2: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff8139a3ba>] device_attach+0x2a/0xc0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 142 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc1-lockdep-fix-a #6
Hardware name: IBM -[8737R2A]-/00Y2738, BIOS -[B2E120RUS-1.20]- 11/30/2012
Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
ffff881036fecd88 ffff881036fef678 ffffffff8161a919 0000000000000003
ffff881036fec400 ffff881036fef6a8 ffffffff810c2234 ffff881036fec400
ffff881036fecd88 ffff881036fec400 0000000000000000 ffff881036fef708
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8161a919>] dump_stack+0x59/0x80
[<ffffffff810c2234>] print_deadlock_bug+0xf4/0x100
[<ffffffff810c3d14>] validate_chain+0x504/0x750
[<ffffffff810c426d>] __lock_acquire+0x30d/0x580
[<ffffffff810c4577>] lock_acquire+0x97/0x170
[<ffffffff81077100>] ? start_flush_work+0x220/0x220
[<ffffffff81077148>] flush_work+0x48/0xb0
[<ffffffff81077100>] ? start_flush_work+0x220/0x220
[<ffffffff810c2c10>] ? mark_held_locks+0x80/0x130
[<ffffffff81074cfb>] ? queue_work_on+0x4b/0xa0
[<ffffffff810c2f85>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x105/0x1d0
[<ffffffff810c305d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff81077320>] work_on_cpu+0x80/0x90
[<ffffffff8106f950>] ? wqattrs_hash+0x190/0x190
[<ffffffff812d37b0>] ? pci_pm_prepare+0x60/0x60
[<ffffffff812a0059>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x29/0x50
[<ffffffff812d38da>] __pci_device_probe+0x9a/0xe0
[<ffffffff81620850>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[<ffffffff812d4be2>] ? pci_dev_get+0x22/0x30
[<ffffffff812d4c2a>] pci_device_probe+0x3a/0x60
[<ffffffff81620850>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[<ffffffff8139a4bc>] really_probe+0x6c/0x320
[<ffffffff8139a7b7>] driver_probe_device+0x47/0xa0
[<ffffffff8139a8c0>] ? __driver_attach+0xb0/0xb0
[<ffffffff8139a913>] __device_attach+0x53/0x60
[<ffffffff81398404>] bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xa0
[<ffffffff8139a430>] device_attach+0xa0/0xc0
[<ffffffff812cb2d9>] pci_bus_add_device+0x39/0x60
[<ffffffff812eec21>] virtfn_add+0x251/0x3e0
[<ffffffff810c305d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff812ef29f>] sriov_enable+0x22f/0x3d0
[<ffffffff812ef48d>] pci_enable_sriov+0x4d/0x60
[<ffffffffa0143045>] be_vf_setup+0x175/0x410 [be2net]
[<ffffffffa01493ca>] be_setup+0x37a/0x4b0 [be2net]
[<ffffffffa0149ac0>] be_probe+0x5c0/0x820 [be2net]
[<ffffffff812d37fe>] local_pci_probe+0x4e/0x90
[<ffffffff8106f968>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x18/0x30
[<ffffffff81075e4a>] process_one_work+0x1da/0x610
[<ffffffff81075dd9>] ? process_one_work+0x169/0x610
[<ffffffff8107650c>] worker_thread+0x28c/0x3a0
[<ffffffff81076280>] ? process_one_work+0x610/0x610
[<ffffffff8107da3e>] kthread+0xee/0x100
[<ffffffff8107d950>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[<ffffffff8162a71c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff8107d950>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 14:41 Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2013-07-17 10:07 ` workqueue, pci: INFO: possible recursive locking detected Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-18 20:23 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-19 1:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-19 8:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-22 11:52 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-22 15:37 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-22 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-22 22:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-22 22:33 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-07-22 21:32 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-23 1:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-23 14:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-24 10:31 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-07-24 16:25 ` [PATCH] workqueue: allow work_on_cpu() to be called recursively Tejun Heo
2013-07-27 17:11 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E55B7D.2040209@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.