diff for duplicates of <51E641C7.4000107@nvidia.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index ca52048..356b92d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ On 07/16/2013 12:57 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
 How about "Introduce status bits"
 
 > 
->> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
+>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
 >> ---
 >>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c |   72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 >>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ Ok, I will remove it.
 >> +
 >> +	lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &status);
 >> +
->> +	if (data->kind == max6696)
+>> +	if (data->kind = max6696)
 >> +		lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &status2);
 >> +
->> +	if ((status & 0x7f) == 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) == 0)
+>> +	if ((status & 0x7f) = 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) = 0)
 >> +		return false;
 > 
 > It's a bit disappointing to not use the freshly introduced constants.
@@ -123,10 +123,10 @@ him back to talk about below issue.
 >> -
 >> -	lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
 >> -
->> -	if (data->kind == max6696)
+>> -	if (data->kind = max6696)
 >> -		lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms2);
 >> -
->> -	if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) == 0) {
+>> -	if ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) = 0) {
 >> +	if (!lm90_is_tripped(client)) {
 > 
 > You could swap the success and failure cases to avoid this negation.
@@ -177,4 +177,10 @@ So we can read the status only once and pass it.
 >>  		 && (alarms & data->alert_alarms)) {
 >>  			dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Disabling ALERT#\n");
 > 
->
+> 
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+lm-sensors mailing list
+lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
+http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 190c755..3bbaf69 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
  "ref\01373615287-18502-3-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com\0"
  "ref\020130715185727.4ebde8c4@endymion.delvare\0"
  "ref\020130715185727.4ebde8c4-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: (lm90) use macro defines for the status bit\0"
- "Date\0Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:03:35 +0800\0"
+ "From\0Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: (lm90) use macro defines for the status bit\0"
+ "Date\0Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:03:35 +0000\0"
  "To\0Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>"
   thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  "How about \"Introduce status bits\"\n"
  "\n"
  "> \n"
- ">> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ ">> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>\n"
  ">> ---\n"
  ">>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c |   72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------\n"
  ">>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)\n"
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@
  ">> +\n"
  ">> +\tlm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &status);\n"
  ">> +\n"
- ">> +\tif (data->kind == max6696)\n"
+ ">> +\tif (data->kind = max6696)\n"
  ">> +\t\tlm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &status2);\n"
  ">> +\n"
- ">> +\tif ((status & 0x7f) == 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) == 0)\n"
+ ">> +\tif ((status & 0x7f) = 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) = 0)\n"
  ">> +\t\treturn false;\n"
  "> \n"
  "> It's a bit disappointing to not use the freshly introduced constants.\n"
@@ -138,10 +138,10 @@
  ">> -\n"
  ">> -\tlm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);\n"
  ">> -\n"
- ">> -\tif (data->kind == max6696)\n"
+ ">> -\tif (data->kind = max6696)\n"
  ">> -\t\tlm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms2);\n"
  ">> -\n"
- ">> -\tif ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) == 0) {\n"
+ ">> -\tif ((alarms & 0x7f) = 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) = 0) {\n"
  ">> +\tif (!lm90_is_tripped(client)) {\n"
  "> \n"
  "> You could swap the success and failure cases to avoid this negation.\n"
@@ -192,6 +192,12 @@
  ">>  \t\t && (alarms & data->alert_alarms)) {\n"
  ">>  \t\t\tdev_dbg(&client->dev, \"Disabling ALERT#\\n\");\n"
  "> \n"
- >
+ "> \n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
+ "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
+ http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
 
-334afdbdd845566321838f2929d7f819809e3241b2a8f33a9fcac2e8d34fe46f
+a3fa2ff1d473815e40c38efb4385ba1c4517eec89fe861c6b198ae850c5ae868
