On 2013年07月13日 20:21, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 01:26 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2013年07月09日 23:11, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2013 10:09 AM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/2013 10:33 PM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2013年07月03日 21:23, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 10:18 PM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2013年07月02日 22:29, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 02:39 AM, Fan Du wrote:
>>>>>>>>> When sctp sits on IPv6, sctp_transport_dst_check pass cookie as
>>>>>>>>> ZERO,
>>>>>>>>> as a result ip6_dst_check always fail out. This behaviour makes
>>>>>>>>> transport->dst useless, because every sctp_packet_transmit must
>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>> for valid dst(Is this what supposed to be?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One aggressive way is to call rt_genid_bump which invalid all
>>>>>>>>> dst to
>>>>>>>>> make new dst for transport, apparently it also hurts others.
>>>>>>>>> I'm sure this may not be the best for all, so any commnets?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 18 ++++++++++++------
>>>>>>>>> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 ++
>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>>>> index cd89510..f05af01 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>>>> @@ -719,14 +719,20 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union
>>>>>>>>> sctp_addr *addr)
>>>>>>>>> addr->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[2] = htonl(0x0000ffff);
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -/* The cookie is always 0 since this is how it's used in the
>>>>>>>>> - * pmtu code.
>>>>>>>>> - */
>>>>>>>>> +/* Set cookie with the right one for IPv6 and zero for others */
>>>>>>>>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>>>>>>>>> sctp_transport *t)
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>>>>>>>>> - dst_release(t->dst);
>>>>>>>>> - t->dst = NULL;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + if (t->dst) {
>>>>>>>>> + struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)t->dst;
>>>>>>>>> + u32 cookie = 0;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> + if ((t->af_specific->sa_family == AF_INET6) && rt->rt6i_node)
>>>>>>>>> + cookie = rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum;
>>>>>>>>> + if (!dst_check(t->dst, cookie)) {
>>>>>>>>> + dst_release(t->dst);
>>>>>>>>> + t->dst = NULL;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it would be better if we stored the dst_cookie in the
>>>>>>>> transport structure and initialized it at lookup time. If you do
>>>>>>>> that,
>>>>>>>> then if the route table changes, we'd correctly detect it without
>>>>>>>> artificially bumping rt_genid (and hurting ipv4).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Vlad/Neil
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this what you mean?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, exactly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Vlad
>>>>>
>>>>> I thinks twice about below patch, this is actually a chicken-egg issue.
>>>>> Look below scenario:
>>>>> (1) The first time we push packet through a transport, dst_cookie is 0,
>>>>> so sctp_transport_dst_check also pass cookie as 0, then return dst
>>>>> as NULL.
>>>>> Then we lookup dst by sctp_transport_route, and in there we
>>>>> initiate dst_cookie
>>>>> with rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
>>>>>
>>>>> (2) Then the next time we push packet through this transport again,
>>>>> we pass dst_cookie(rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum) to ip6_dst_check, and
>>>>> return valid dst without bothering to lookup dst again.
>>>>
>>>> No, if the route was removed rt6i_node will be NULL, and NULL will be
>>>> returned from ip6_dst_check(). If the route still exists then we'll
>>>> compare the serial number with a cookie.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BUT, suppose when deleting the source address of this dst after
>>>>> transport->dst_cookie
>>>>> has been well initialized. transport->dst_cookie still holds
>>>>> rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum,
>>>>> meaning ip6_dst_check will return valid dst, which it shouldn't in this
>>>>> case, the
>>>>> result will be association ABORT.
>>>>
>>>> No, removing the address cause the route for that prefix to be removed
>>>> as well. This will set rt6i_node to NULL.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Other way is invalid all transport->dst which using the deleting
>>>>> address
>>>>> as source address
>>>>> without bumping gen_id, problem is the traverse times depends
>>>>> heavily on
>>>>> transport number,
>>>>> and also need to take account locking issue it will introduce.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > No, you are not missing anything. IPv4 doesn't use the cookie and
>>>>> always seems to pass it as 0.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Yes, ipv4 will bump the gen_id thus invalidating all routes (there
>>>>> has been disagreement about it).
>>>>> > IPv6 doesn't do that. In ipv6, when the addresses are added or
>>>>> removed, routes are also added or removed and
>>>>> > any time the route is added it will have a new serial number. So, you
>>>>> don't have to disturb ipv4 cache when ipv6 routing info changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much for your explanation!
>>>>>
>>>>> IPv6 don't bump gen_id, when adding/deleting address, and tag an serial
>>>>> number with each route.
>>>>> Doing this way loose the semantic of dst_check, because SCTP depends no
>>>>> dst_check fulfill its
>>>>> duty to actually check whether the holding dst is still valid, well
>>>>> most
>>>>> other Layer 4 protocol
>>>>> simply rely on ip6_route_output/ip6_dst_lookup_flow to grab dst every
>>>>> time sending data out.
>>>>
>>>> Look at how other protocols (tcp, dccp) do this. It is sufficient to
>>>> cache the route serial number into the dst_cookie at the time the route
>>>> was lookup-up and cached. Then the cookie is passed to dst_check to
>>>> validate the route.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Fan
>>>
>>> Have you tried the updated patch you sent? Based on what the tcp/udp
>>> code is doing, the updated patch should work correctly. If it does,
>>> can you re-post with attribution/sign-off
>>>
>>
>> Hello Vlad and Neil
>>
>> I don't know whether my test procedure has drawbacks or something else.
>> It seems the updated patch does not works well, but my first patch is ok
>> under below configuration.
>>
>> Host A:
>> ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 2001::803/64
>> ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 2001::804/64
>> sctp_darn -H 2001::803 -B 2001::804 -P 5001 -l
>>
>> Host B:
>> ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 2001::805/64
>> ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 2001::806/64
>> sctp_darn -H 2001::805 -B 2001::806 -P 5002 -h 2001::803 -p
>
> Hi Fan
>
> Could you try using different prefixes. I think we are running into some routing issue.
>
> For example, configure 2001:1::803/64 and 2001:2::804/64. I think that's going to make this work (it seems to for me).

Hello Vlad

By using different prefix as below configuration

      Server           Client
2001:1::803/64  <-> 2001:1::805/64
2001:2::804/64  <-> 2001:2::806/64

After association setup, heartbeat path is different than using same prefix
as before. Yes, delete 2001:2::804/64 won't cause association ABORT. That's
because, delete 2001:2::804/64 will also make the prefix route got deleted as
well, which in turn invalidate rt destinate to 2001:2::806/64. So subsequent
HEART_BEAT checks from 2001:2::804/64 -> 2001:2::806/64 will use ip6_null_entry
as rt, which actually discard packet. See sctp_ipv6_route_2prefix.jpeg for
route table in this configuration.

As is shown in sctp_ipv6_route_same_prefix.jpeg for using same prefix configuration,
Delete 2001::804/64 won't cause prefix route deleted as well as rt in (4) destinate
to 2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64. That's because 2001::803/64 is
still alive, which make onlink=1 in ipv6_del_addr, this is where the substantial
difference between same prefix configuration and different prefix configuration :)
So packet are still transmitted out to 2001::806 with source address as 2001::804/64.

Current IPv6 route table implementation cannot prudently rudely traverse all the node
below the prefix route to mark new fn_sernum, that's is way too much time-consuming,
neither could we delete all the node below the prefix route, same reason as before.
As you putted earlier, bump_genid is not allowed for IPv6, I think there isn't a better
way here to enforce SCTP multi-home so far than the patch I posted here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137359898232255&w=2

Or should I only repost dst_cookie style patch in here ?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=137281805012583&w=2

Thanks for reading this long story...


> -vlad
>> 5001 -s
>>
>> hbinterval set to 2 seconds, after setup the association, primary
>> address: 2001::804 <--> 2001::806
>>
>>
>> Step 1:
>>
>> After adding in IPv6 address to an interface, we populate
>> struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp->rt->rt6i_node, this rt6i_node is stored in a
>> radix tree.
>>
>> addrconf_add_ifaddr
>> ->inet6_addr_add
>> ->ipv6_add_addr <-- Do DAD checking afterward.
>> ->addrconf_prefix_route
>> ->ip6_route_add
>> ->__ip6_ins_rt
>> ->fib6_add
>> ->fib6_add_1 <-- Create struct fib6_node *fn
>> ->fib6_add_rt2node
>> ->rt->rt6i_node = fn; (*1*)
>>
>> Step 2:
>>
>> In host A ,for the packet destinate for 2001::806 using source address
>> 2001::804,
>> In sctp_v6_get_dst, let's print the rt, rt->rt6i_node, and
>> rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
>> after ip6_dst_lookup_flow got valid dst. The problem is the
>> transport->dst->rt6i_node
>> we have looked for is *not* the rt6i_node in (*1*), I'm not drunk here.....
>> So in Step 3, let's be naughty: ifconfig eth1 inet6 del 2001::804/64
>>
>>
>> Step 3:
>>
>> Then we delete the IPv6 address, certainly this struct inet6_ifaddr
>> *ifp->rt
>> will be delete as well.
>>
>> addrconf_del_ifaddr
>> ->inet6_addr_del
>> ->ipv6_del_addr
>> ->ipv6_ifa_notify /RTM_DELADDR
>> ->ip6_del_rt
>> ->__ip6_del_rt
>> ->fib6_del
>> ->fib6_del_route
>> -> rt->rt6i_node = NULL; (*2*) here we undo the
>> operation in (*1*),
>> but rt6i_node in Step2 is
>> untouched!
>>
>> Step 4:
>> Then we do the dst checking, for sctp_tranport_dst_check it looks like
>> nothing in Step3
>> has consequence on it. So transport->dst is still valid, let's ship the
>> packet out
>> using 2001::804. The real world test result is ASSOCIATION ABORT after a
>> while.
>> As far as I can tell, rt in Step 2 got deleted *after* the ASSOCIATION
>> ABORT.
>>
>> sctp_tranport_dst_check
>> ->dst_check
>> -> ip6_dst_check
>>
>>
>> Root node
>> *
>> / \
>> * <-- fn node we are using.
>> / \
>> *
>> / \
>> *
>> / \
>> * <--- Add a new fn node, on the path from the root node down to
>> here, each fn
>> now has new fn_sernum, which force dst_check return NULL
>> for lookup again.
>> Then previously save fn_sernum will take effect now. But
>> when delete address
>> only the ifp->rt->rt6i_node is set to NULL.
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -vlad
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -vlad
>>>>>
>>>>> So please pronounce a final judgment.
>>>>>
>>>>>> -vlad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>> index cd89510..0a646a5 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h
>>>>>>> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ static inline void sctp_v4_map_v6(union sctp_addr
>>>>>>> *addr)
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> static inline struct dst_entry *sctp_transport_dst_check(struct
>>>>>>> sctp_transport *t)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, 0)) {
>>>>>>> + if (t->dst && !dst_check(t->dst, t->dst_cookie)) {
>>>>>>> dst_release(t->dst);
>>>>>>> t->dst = NULL;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>>>>>> index 1bd4c41..cafdd19 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
>>>>>>> @@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ struct sctp_transport {
>>>>>>> __u64 hb_nonce;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> struct rcu_head rcu;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + u32 dst_cookie;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> struct sctp_transport *sctp_transport_new(struct net *, const union
>>>>>>> sctp_addr *,
>>>>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>> index 8ee553b..82a420f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ out:
>>>>>>> struct rt6_info *rt;
>>>>>>> rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst;
>>>>>>> t->dst = dst;
>>>>>>> + t->dst_cookie = rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum
>>>>>>> : 0;
>>>>>>> SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("rt6_dst:%pI6 rt6_src:%pI6\n",
>>>>>>> &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, &fl6->saddr);
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -vlad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> return t->dst;
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>>>> index 8ee553b..cfae77e 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct
>>>>>>>>> notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + /* invalid all transport dst forcing to look up new dst */
>>>>>>>>> + rt_genid_bump(net);
>>>>>>>>> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

-- 
浮沉随浪只记今朝笑

--fan