All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:53:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E71249.4050200@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org>

On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
>> I agree, we should drop the check.  It's annoying in uniprocessors and
>> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
>> is wrong.
>>
> Ok. How about this?

Any comments?

>
> ----8<-----
> Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask()
>
> In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
> registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
> gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
>
>  GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
>
> if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
> a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
> fine. Remove this check because if you're on a multiprocessor
> system it's unlikely to be printed unless your DT is wrong or
> your hardware is broken.
>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 19ceaa60..4fbcea9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!mask)
> -		pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
> -
>  	return mask;
>  }
>  


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:53:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E71249.4050200@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org>

On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
>> I agree, we should drop the check.  It's annoying in uniprocessors and
>> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
>> is wrong.
>>
> Ok. How about this?

Any comments?

>
> ----8<-----
> Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask()
>
> In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
> registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
> gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
>
>  GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
>
> if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
> a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
> fine. Remove this check because if you're on a multiprocessor
> system it's unlikely to be printed unless your DT is wrong or
> your hardware is broken.
>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 19ceaa60..4fbcea9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  			break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!mask)
> -		pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
> -
>  	return mask;
>  }
>  


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-05 23:39 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system Stephen Boyd
2013-07-05 23:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-12 11:13 ` Javi Merino
2013-07-12 11:13   ` Javi Merino
2013-07-12 12:10   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-12 12:10     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 21:53     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-07-17 21:53       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:34       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:34         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:36         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:36           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:53           ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:53             ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 23:06             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 23:06               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:43               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:43                 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:59                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-22 18:59                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23  4:35                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-23  4:35                     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-23  4:51                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23  4:51                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23  9:15                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-23  9:15                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-20  7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-20  7:27   ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-23 17:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-23 17:01     ` Stephen Boyd
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-31  0:43 Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  0:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  7:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-31  7:09   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-31  7:09   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-12  3:51   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-12  3:51     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-12  3:51     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-01 21:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-01 21:25   ` Stefan Agner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E71249.4050200@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.