All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm RAID and segtypes... difference to MD?
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:30:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E84268.6030000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374167576.23440.3.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net>

Dne 18.7.2013 19:12, Christoph Anton Mitterer napsal(a):
> Hi.
>
> I just stumbled across that LVM nowadays also supports higher RAID
> levels?
>
> Is this "just" reusing the MD code... or is it a new implementation?

reuse


>
> Does using it provide any advantages (i.e. performance) other than using
> the same userland tools... and perhaps greater flexibility in where the
> PEs for a RAID come from (which may be pretty arbitrary with LVM, and is
> always some devices for MD)... not that I'd say that such "flexibility"
> is really useful.

yep stacking of LVs
However some other features available in mdadm are missing in lvm
(i.e. array reshape)


> Is there any larger documentation available on what happens with the
> RAID levels and the other segtypes? I couldn't find basically
> anything... I mean things like mirror/striped are probably clear... but
> free, error, etc.?


https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/raid_volumes.html


Zdenek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 17:12 [linux-lvm] lvm RAID and segtypes... difference to MD? Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-18 19:30 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2013-07-18 21:36   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-19  9:35     ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E84268.6030000@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=calestyo@scientia.net \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.