From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:37:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-bn1lp0156.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.156]:51782 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6827417Ab3GRUhpUq-7F (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:37:45 +0200 Received: from BY2PRD0712HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.255.246.34) by BLUPR07MB113.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.200.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.731.12; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:37:37 +0000 Received: from dl.caveonetworks.com (64.2.3.195) by pod51018.outlook.com (10.255.246.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.329.3; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:37:34 +0000 Message-ID: <51E8520E.2050604@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:37:34 -0700 From: David Daney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: David Daney , , , Corey Minyard , David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips/ftrace: Fix function tracing return address to match References: <1373926637-24627-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1374178262.6458.266.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E84CBC.80206@gmail.com> <1374179160.6458.269.camel@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1374179160.6458.269.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [64.2.3.195] X-Forefront-PRVS: 0911D5CE78 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(479174003)(377424004)(24454002)(51704005)(189002)(199002)(377454003)(56776001)(83072001)(49866001)(53416003)(46102001)(80316001)(74706001)(47776003)(76786001)(81542001)(47736001)(59896001)(74366001)(74502001)(56816003)(83322001)(79102001)(47976001)(76796001)(53806001)(65956001)(51856001)(65806001)(81342001)(33656001)(47446002)(54356001)(80022001)(64126003)(77096001)(31966008)(36756003)(16406001)(4396001)(50986001)(59766001)(66066001)(76482001)(74662001)(69226001)(23676002)(74876001)(50466002)(77982001)(19580385001)(54316002)(63696002)(19580395003);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BLUPR07MB113;H:BY2PRD0712HT001.namprd07.prod.outlook.com;CLIP:64.2.3.195;RD:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a3ec847f-e37f-4d9a-9900-9d9d96f75f58.caviumnetworks.com Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 37329 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 07/18/2013 01:26 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 13:14 -0700, David Daney wrote: > >> There is an mcount ABI difference based on which GCC version you are >> using, although I wouldn't think it would effect this bit. >> >> We are using GCC-4.7 FWIW. >> >> David Daney > > I'm using 4.6.3 which I downloaded from > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/ I would expect that version to be fine too. The option in question is -mmcount-ra-address, which I added to GCC-4.5 > > I can down load the 4.7 version and see if that makes a difference. > > -- Steve > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bn1lp0156.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.156]:51782 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6827417Ab3GRUhpUq-7F (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: <51E8520E.2050604@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:37:34 -0700 From: David Daney MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips/ftrace: Fix function tracing return address to match References: <1373926637-24627-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1374178262.6458.266.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E84CBC.80206@gmail.com> <1374179160.6458.269.camel@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1374179160.6458.269.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, Corey Minyard , David Daney Message-ID: <20130718203734.8zSrfvCFbC0nsOGJFMvp9T8v1Qip9D-_pOyedGmuqYM@z> On 07/18/2013 01:26 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 13:14 -0700, David Daney wrote: > >> There is an mcount ABI difference based on which GCC version you are >> using, although I wouldn't think it would effect this bit. >> >> We are using GCC-4.7 FWIW. >> >> David Daney > > I'm using 4.6.3 which I downloaded from > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/ I would expect that version to be fine too. The option in question is -mmcount-ra-address, which I added to GCC-4.5 > > I can down load the 4.7 version and see if that makes a difference. > > -- Steve > > >