From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] voicecall: Allow second stage string on Dial()
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 09:21:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E94B67.1040009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMOw1v5A78BTX7Ds9WdaN8LxO1wG8h7crF32Bm_83vS7-4V10w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2344 bytes --]
Hi Lucas,
>>
>> AFAIK the original reason this was here was to have the Audio Framework
>> generate the DTMF tones locally. It was not intended for user feedback.
>>
>> The question is how you want your UI to look like. For example, do you want
>> to show the progress of the DTMF tones (e.g. text changing from gray ->
>> black) as they are being dialed?
>
> Could be. Updating one char at a time would cover the feedback from
> the audio framework, but then we need to know what's the tone
> duration.
> I'm just seeing an item in the TODO and brainstorming ideas ;-). I
> have no use case for it.
The tone duration is the troubling bit. In theory all modems should
support the Start/Stop version of DTMF commands. In practice that is
rarely true and they only support +VTS. Perhaps we can do this only on
the hardware that supports the start / stop commands for the first attempt.
The reason this is still a TODO item is that nobody had any clue how to
solve it properly or time to try some things out. So I'm fully open to
new ideas on this one.
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Another interesting case to consider is what should happen if we have a
>>>> Three-Way call, start a DTMF queue and then swap calls.
>>>
>>>
>>> Right now we continue sending the tones, right? We could change
>>> voicecall.c to associate a queue to the active call and throw it away
>>> when this call change state, setting the property to error as above.
>>>
>>
>> The trouble is DTMFs can be applied to a dialing call as well, though I'll
>> need to do some digging to understand how/why.
>
> Yes, but what I said is that we could throw it away when going *out*
> of ACTIVE... if we started the queue on ACTIVE or DIALING is
> irrelevant in this scenario
>
Fair enough. I'm open to this one. It may be useful if we can check
the behavior of some other devices in this area.
>> The number being dialed is sanitized in voicecall_dial. You do not sanitize
>> the tones at all. tone_queue will reject invalid input, but then you should
>> not even accept an invalid dial string here in the first place.
>
> Adding a function to sanitize the tones part and also call it on
> manager_send_tones() then...
>
manager_tone() is fine. Re-read the code if you're not convinced :)
Regards,
-Denis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-19 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-17 23:23 [RFC] voicecall: Allow second stage string on Dial() Lucas De Marchi
2013-07-18 18:50 ` Denis Kenzior
2013-07-19 5:36 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-07-19 13:57 ` Denis Kenzior
2013-07-19 14:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-07-19 14:21 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E94B67.1040009@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.