[PATCH 1/4] bonding: don't call slave_xxx_netpoll under spinlocks

[Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>]

the slave_xxx_netpoll may sleep, so it should't be called under spinlocks.

the slave point of the bonding will not be changed outside rtnl lock,
so rtnl lock is enough here.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 15 +++------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 07f257d4..5eb75ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1249,8 +1249,9 @@ static void bond_poll_controller(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 {
 }
 
-static void __bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct bonding *bond)
+static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 {
+	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
 	struct slave *slave;
 	int i;
 
@@ -1258,14 +1259,6 @@ static void __bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct bonding *bond)
 		if (IS_UP(slave->dev))
 			slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
 }
-static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
-{
-	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
-
-	read_lock(&bond->lock);
-	__bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond);
-	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
-}
 
 static int bond_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct netpoll_info *ni, gfp_t gfp)
 {
@@ -1273,15 +1266,13 @@ static int bond_netpoll_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct netpoll_info *ni, g
 	struct slave *slave;
 	int i, err = 0;
 
-	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
 		err = slave_enable_netpoll(slave);
 		if (err) {
-			__bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond);
+			bond_netpoll_cleanup(dev);
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.0