From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1V0v67-0006re-EU for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0v65-0006os-5M for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0v64-0004Yd-1u for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:53 -0400 Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([78.47.199.172]:35053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0v60-0004X8-ET; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (v220110690675601.yourvserver.net.local [127.0.0.1]) by v220110690675601.yourvserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B8B72809FE; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:58:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at weilnetz.de Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (v220110690675601.yourvserver.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCpjX8I94mWH; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:58:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.178.35] (p54ADAE42.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.174.66]) by v220110690675601.yourvserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7E447280079; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:58:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:58:34 +0200 From: Stefan Weil User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= References: <1373647719-32757-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <51E4E011.70407@weilnetz.de> <51E846AC.5070309@weilnetz.de> <51E98C93.8010508@weilnetz.de> <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 78.47.199.172 Cc: qemu-trivial , Blue Swirl , Anthony Liguori , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: dbdma: macio: Fix format specifiers (build regression) X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:58:54 -0000 Am 20.07.2013 16:24, schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: > > Anthony recently stated very clearly that in order for him to pick up a > patch it needs to have a Reviewed-by. This one only got an Acked-by. No rule without exception. When I look at the list of patches which were picked up recently, I see lots of patches without a Reviewed-by. I still think that build regressions should be fixed very fast and don't understand why it takes so long: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/257203/ (2013-07-05) http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/258774/ (2013-07-12) Do we need more people with commit rights? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0v61-0006oY-HO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0v60-0004Y3-LB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:58:49 -0400 Message-ID: <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:58:34 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373647719-32757-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <51E4E011.70407@weilnetz.de> <51E846AC.5070309@weilnetz.de> <51E98C93.8010508@weilnetz.de> <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: dbdma: macio: Fix format specifiers (build regression) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-trivial , Blue Swirl , Anthony Liguori , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Am 20.07.2013 16:24, schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: > > Anthony recently stated very clearly that in order for him to pick up a > patch it needs to have a Reviewed-by. This one only got an Acked-by. No rule without exception. When I look at the list of patches which were picked up recently, I see lots of patches without a Reviewed-by. I still think that build regressions should be fixed very fast and don't understand why it takes so long: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/257203/ (2013-07-05) http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/258774/ (2013-07-12) Do we need more people with commit rights?