From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] MAINTAINERS: OMAP POWERDOMAIN, update patterns Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:20:09 -0300 Message-ID: <51ECF949.4000802@cesarb.eti.br> References: <8c1406e78f8536ff46ad9000b5634487243d5854.1374451988.git.joe@perches.com> <1374470152.2061.28.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hm1479-10.locaweb.com.br ([201.76.49.80]:39980 "EHLO hm1479-10.locaweb.com.br" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755896Ab3GVJvt (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 05:51:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , Rajendra Nayak , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Em 22-07-2013 02:32, Paul Walmsley escreveu: > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Joe Perches wrote: > >> I certainly don't object at all if Andrew picks >> up the patches you mentioned and drops these 2. >> >> Andrew, here are links to Cesar's original patches >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/?submitter=3513 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/2/185 >> >> It seems a few are similar/duplicated to these 18. >> >> Cesar, maybe you should resend yours. I thought >> they were applied and forgot all about them. > > Another possibility, assuming that there are some fixes from your series > that Cesar didn't have, would be for you to take his patches into the > series that you're sending to Andrew, assuming that you agree with them. > Then we'd benefit from the superset of fixes. I don't care whose patches are applied or who gets the credit. They are just trivial changes to a text file. What matters is that the patterns are correct enough that get_maintainer.pl does the right thing. -- Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb@cesarb.eti.br