From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lpoetter@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: change defconfig to stop spawning xterm
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:38:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ED0BBF.7060502@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=0NWediExGCwJ3R-O+7V_9sgGzJPUaXgaTEka5O05N=Q@mail.gmail.com>
CC'ing Lennart.
Am 22.07.2013 11:45, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> [1]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012152.html
>
> ... and the patches were rejected. Lennart says that UML providing
> /dev/tty* is wrong, and that UML should call them /dev/hvc* (or
> something). Can we do something about the situation? Can we remove
> /dev/tty*, and provide /dev/hvc*? Will we be breaking existing users?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> UML shouldn't be penalized for not implementing some terminal emulation,
>> but it should be penalized for doing so under the label of "VT support",
>> which it simply is not providing.
>>
>> They can call their ttys any way they want. If the call them
>> /dev/tty[1..64] however, then they need to implement the VC
>> interfaces. All of them.
Lennart, can you please explain us why /dev/tty[1..64] is forced to
have virtual console support?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 18:20 [PATCH] um: change defconfig to stop spawning xterm Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-19 18:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-19 19:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 9:45 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 10:38 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2013-07-22 10:43 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 11:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 22:32 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-23 5:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-23 5:47 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-07-23 7:57 ` Al Viro
2013-07-24 16:49 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-24 16:38 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-22 12:40 ` Al Viro
2013-07-22 13:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 13:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 13:42 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 14:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 15:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 19:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 20:01 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ED0BBF.7060502@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpoetter@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.