From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Jia Liu <proljc@gmail.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:33:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ED26AE.4030201@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9U0jEumpyEzuUXc9Ce4+NAhGD7zmi-713wx0RMCOcL2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Am 22.07.2013 13:34, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 22 July 2013 12:17, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 22.07.2013 12:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> In any case we should be
>>> consistent across target architectures about what we allow.
>>
>> alpha allows both
[...]
>> It didn't have -cpu ? before QOM, so we decided to print the type names
>> there.
>
> Looking at all of the '-cpu help' output, alpha seems to be
> the odd one out here: none of the others list valid CPUs
> with "-$arch-cpu" suffixes.
Right, because all others had implemented -cpu ? before we introduced
that naming scheme and I tried to keep output compatibility for them.
Focus for alpha was therefore on -cpu foo compatibility only.
Anthony had clearly stated on a KVM call that using full type names for
future CPU hot-add was the right thing to do and possibly even composite
convenience types like 4core-xeonblabla-x86_64-cpu; how that relates to
-cpu and new targets was never clearly defined though. ;)
For VMSD we decided to deviate for new migratable targets from legacy
CPUs in favor of consistency with devices, for instance.
>> Stripping -alpha-cpu off typenames would surely be possible.
>
> I think that that would be better in the name of consistency.
> Also regarding consistency, not all targets react very well
> to being asked for a nonexistent cpu via "-cpu xyzzy":
> alpha and s390x just plough on without an error
s390x does not have models yet. This will get fixed once we have agreed
on model names and their implementation.
> lm32 and unicore32 segfault
>
> (some of this may be default board model bugs rather than
> target-* bugs).
Yeah, for one sh4 board where I noticed it while refactoring I already
applied an error check. I guess cpu_init() / cpu_*_init() is not
NULL-checked in more machines. Not sure if trying invalid arguments
would be applicable for a qtest?
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 8:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] target-openrisc hw/openrisc: Some OpenRISC fix Jia Liu
2013-07-22 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] hw/openrisc: Indent typo Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:21 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/openrisc: Use stderr output instead of qemu_log Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:21 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] target-openrisc: Free typename Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:37 ` Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:41 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 9:43 ` Jia Liu
2013-07-22 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:29 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 9:42 ` Jia Liu
2013-07-22 9:43 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 9:54 ` Jia Liu
2013-07-22 10:12 ` Jia Liu
2013-07-22 10:37 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-22 10:40 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 11:17 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-22 11:34 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 12:26 ` [Qemu-devel] -cpu behavior (was: [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name) Andreas Färber
2013-07-22 12:33 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-07-22 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name Anthony Liguori
2013-07-22 15:38 ` Peter Maydell
2013-07-22 16:29 ` [Qemu-devel] -cpu behavior (was: [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name) Andreas Färber
2013-07-22 17:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] target-openrisc: Fix cpu_model by name Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ED26AE.4030201@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=proljc@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.