From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Add an alarm disable quirk
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:59:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ED9D15.3010304@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130719151321.GD19581@pd.tnic>
On 07/19/2013 08:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:26:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:53:49AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>> I assumed it was some sort of BIOS issue where any modification of the
>>>> RTC_AIE bit caused the alarm irq line to be left high(or something
>>>> like that) that triggered the immediate power-on on shutdown. But I've
>>>> not been able to dig down on this.
>>> Ha, this actually fits like an ass on a bucket (don't ask - German
>>> proverb :-)).
>>>
>>> If what you're saying is actually the case, then this explains why not
>>> writing to 0xb doesn't cause the alarm irq to fire.
>>>
>>> Btw, in the trace above we do the disabling twice. Once from
>>> rtc_timer_remove() and then again from rtc_timer_do_work().
>>>
>>> So, if we disable it once and we touch RTC_AIE again causing the second
>>> time to rearm the alarm irq, this would explain the issue. Which reminds
>>> me:
>>>
>>> Maybe we should read out the alarm interrupt first and disable it only
>>> if it is enabled - that would save us the modification of RTC_AIE. Cool,
>>> I'll try that tomorrow.
>> Well, the below seems to do the trick. But since I don't trust the BIOS
>> in any way, I'll run it a couple more days here. Btw, I think we should
>> commit this regardless, as it saves us unneeded writes:
> Nope, this doesn't help - box just rebooted. :(
>
> So I'm back to the DMI quirk patch...
So did this work some of the time, but not all? Or was the behavior
totally unchanged with this?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-18 15:44 [PATCH] RTC: Add an alarm disable quirk Borislav Petkov
2013-07-18 16:35 ` John Stultz
2013-07-18 22:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-19 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-19 15:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-19 21:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-20 17:00 ` [PATCH -v2] " Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 21:00 ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 21:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 22:03 ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 20:59 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-07-22 21:12 ` [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 21:15 ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 21:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 22:17 ` John Stultz
2013-07-23 5:03 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ED9D15.3010304@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rabin.vincent@stericsson.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.