From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1V1gHp-0000An-DV for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1gHm-00006g-QD for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1gHl-0004Iz-CF for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:06 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:46199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1gHh-0004HO-Ox; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.88.2] (mjt.vpn.tls.msk.ru [192.168.177.99]) by isrv.corpit.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E0B429A5; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:22:01 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <51EEBBB6.5080500@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:21:58 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev Organization: Telecom Service, JSC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Weil References: <1373647719-32757-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <51E4E011.70407@weilnetz.de> <51E846AC.5070309@weilnetz.de> <51E98C93.8010508@weilnetz.de> <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 OpenPGP: id=804465C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.62.121.231 Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-trivial , qemu-devel , Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: dbdma: macio: Fix format specifiers (build regression) X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:22:07 -0000 21.07.2013 18:58, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 20.07.2013 16:24, schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >> >> Anthony recently stated very clearly that in order for him to pick up = a >> patch it needs to have a Reviewed-by. This one only got an Acked-by. >=20 >=20 > No rule without exception. When I look at the list of patches > which were picked up recently, I see lots of patches without > a Reviewed-by. >=20 > I still think that build regressions should be fixed > very fast and don't understand why it takes so long: I reviewed the patch and it appears to be correct. Applied to the trivial patches queue. Thanks, /mjt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1gHj-00005w-7D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1gHi-0004HX-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:22:03 -0400 Message-ID: <51EEBBB6.5080500@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:21:58 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373647719-32757-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <51E4E011.70407@weilnetz.de> <51E846AC.5070309@weilnetz.de> <51E98C93.8010508@weilnetz.de> <51EA9DBA.4080400@suse.de> <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <51EBF71A.3050300@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] PPC: dbdma: macio: Fix format specifiers (build regression) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-trivial , qemu-devel , Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= 21.07.2013 18:58, Stefan Weil wrote: > Am 20.07.2013 16:24, schrieb Andreas F=E4rber: >> >> Anthony recently stated very clearly that in order for him to pick up = a >> patch it needs to have a Reviewed-by. This one only got an Acked-by. >=20 >=20 > No rule without exception. When I look at the list of patches > which were picked up recently, I see lots of patches without > a Reviewed-by. >=20 > I still think that build regressions should be fixed > very fast and don't understand why it takes so long: I reviewed the patch and it appears to be correct. Applied to the trivial patches queue. Thanks, /mjt