From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60471)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V1kpG-0002tM-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:12:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V1kpF-0006vm-6B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:12:57 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59570 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1V1kpE-0006vi-Vx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:12:57 -0400
Message-ID: <51EEFFE3.3090405@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:12:51 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1374547404-11700-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA-OkRD6mb7oG=QDDfV0SoEwMEuVEE2bsGWHhqDiZaMd7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA8vURWr2sLJ+SS_2tLd82ESoQfqYZ-iuUb7CcApqYK+Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E04E931-F4B5-45A7-8F22-7DE7F7174A59@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA_qTqW8Rw7Qggatw-f+29h9Wu7fDx_-PsQ_fnnJTh9nJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<49089A7A-F4CF-4E35-A7A9-31C000DEE487@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <49089A7A-F4CF-4E35-A7A9-31C000DEE487@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/16] arm: A9MPCore+A15MPCore
	QOM'ification
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>, Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>

Am 23.07.2013 23:55, schrieb Alexander Graf:
> On 23.07.2013, at 23:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 23 July 2013 22:36, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Or maybe
>>>
>>> struct MyObject {
>>>  PUBLIC_FIELDS
>>>  __field int publicfield;
>>>  PRIVATE_FIELDS
>>>  __field int privatefield;
>>> }
>>
>> I can't see an obvious way to make those do the right
>> thing with the C preprocessor... am I missing something?
>=20
> No, I'm probably just daydreaming :). Macros can't redefine other defin=
es, so this probably won't work....
>=20
> So yes, prepending the visibility on every field seems to be the most s=
traight forward choice.

I wonder how many public fields do we actually have? Close to zero?
Might there be a way to mark all fields of a struct as private at struct
level, except for those explicitly marked up as public?

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg