From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: xenalyze: indent multicall subcalls in dump-all view Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:04:16 +0100 Message-ID: <51F02530.9050606@eu.citrix.com> References: <51ED5D0F.20003@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51ED5D0F.20003@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel Cc: Xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/22/2013 05:25 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > This was accidentally ommitted from the original commit c02cd0695011 > (xenalyze: decode PV_HYPERCALL_SUBCALL events). > > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel Applied, thanks. -George > --- > diff -r 2080678babbf xenalyze.c > --- a/xenalyze.c Thu Oct 04 07:40:10 2012 -0400 > +++ b/xenalyze.c Mon Jul 22 17:19:11 2013 +0100 > @@ -6682,11 +6682,11 @@ void pv_hypercall_v2_process(struct reco > uint64_t args[6]; > > if(op < HYPERCALL_MAX) > - printf(" %s hypercall %2x (%s)", > - ri->dump_header, op, hypercall_name[op]); > + printf(" %s%s hypercall %2x (%s)", > + ri->dump_header, indent, op, hypercall_name[op]); > else > - printf(" %s hypercall %2x", > - ri->dump_header, op); > + printf(" %s%s hypercall %2x", > + ri->dump_header, indent, op); > > switch(op) { > case HYPERCALL_mmu_update: >