From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B446AF67 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2013 09:23:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,744,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="375980275" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.43]) ([10.255.14.43]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2013 09:23:49 -0700 Message-ID: <51F15115.3040008@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:23:49 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' , "Iorga, Cristian" , "Burton, Ross" Subject: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:23:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cristi, Ross: There is currently a PREFERRED_PROVIDER issue with bluez4 and bluez5 and I am beginning to think we need to distinguish the libasound-module-bluez with libasound-module-bluez5. I am also seeing some areas where we might need a virtual/bluez to allow recipes to enable features in places like connman and ofono Thoughts? -- Sau! Saul Wold Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel Yocto Project / Poky Build System