From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2Qmb-00023X-M5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:01:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2Qma-0003U1-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:01:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.mail.uni-mannheim.de ([134.155.96.80]:58663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2QmZ-0003Td-RT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:00:59 -0400 Message-ID: <51F175E8.2000101@weilnetz.de> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:00:56 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373925172-26834-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <1373925172-26834-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] w32, w64: Add build rule for installer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel Am 15.07.2013 23:52, schrieb Stefan Weil: > The new rules in Makefile allow building installers for QEMU on Windows > using NSIS, a package which is also available for Linux distributions > (so cross builds are possible). > > The rules for NSIS are in qemu.nsi which also uses two new images. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > --- > > This code is used to build my signed installers for QEMU on Windows, > see http://qemu.weilnetz.de. > > Best regards > Stefan W. > > > Makefile | 55 +++++++++++ > pc-bios/qemu-nsis.bmp | Bin 0 -> 154542 bytes > pc-bios/qemu-nsis.ico | Bin 0 -> 4846 bytes > qemu.nsi | 250 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 305 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 pc-bios/qemu-nsis.bmp > create mode 100644 pc-bios/qemu-nsis.ico > create mode 100644 qemu.nsi > Hello Anthony, I'd appreciate if this patch could be added to QEMU 1.6. It is valuable for users of QEMU for Windows and does not modify anything for other hosts, so the risk is very low. Should I send a pull request (it's only a single patch, so maybe a pull request is not needed)? Thanks, Stefan