From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen Gang Subject: Re: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG() Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:05:17 +0800 Message-ID: <51F1CB4D.2020301@asianux.com> References: <201307051738.35930.arnd@arndb.de> <20130715151612.9499c2b2ad40e88d183a4600@linux-foundation.org> <20130715222755.GY24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <51E47924.9030005@zytor.com> <20130723093628.GC19786@gmail.com> <51EF1936.7090801@asianux.com> <20130725220502.GI18254@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130725220502.GI18254@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Geert Uytterhoeven List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Chen Gang wrote: > >> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win >>> a K or two.) >>> >> >> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your >> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ? > > I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny > additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are > crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a > measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree > patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support. > Thank you for your reply in details. Thanks -- Chen Gang From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:05:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG() In-Reply-To: <20130725220502.GI18254@gmail.com> References: <201307051738.35930.arnd@arndb.de> <20130715151612.9499c2b2ad40e88d183a4600@linux-foundation.org> <20130715222755.GY24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <51E47924.9030005@zytor.com> <20130723093628.GC19786@gmail.com> <51EF1936.7090801@asianux.com> <20130725220502.GI18254@gmail.com> Message-ID: <51F1CB4D.2020301@asianux.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Chen Gang wrote: > >> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win >>> a K or two.) >>> >> >> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your >> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ? > > I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny > additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are > crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a > measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree > patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support. > Thank you for your reply in details. Thanks -- Chen Gang