From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: uescher <linux-can_ger.kernel.org@myvdr.de>
Subject: Re: slcanpty with TCP support
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:11:24 +0200
Message-ID: <51F38EBC.3040408@myvdr.de>
References: <CAGm1_ksXz6yoMRvdQwroyYV=UG2raKqfii_7aL++a94w_6_S+A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.95]:55394 "EHLO
	smtprelay06.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751057Ab3G0JTs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-can@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 05:19:48 -0400
Received: from [176.34.235.140] (helo=[0.0.0.0])
	by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.68)
	(envelope-from <linux-can_ger.kernel.org@myvdr.de>)
	id 1V30X7-000359-V5
	for linux-can@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:11:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAGm1_ksXz6yoMRvdQwroyYV=UG2raKqfii_7aL++a94w_6_S+A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-can.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org

Yegor Yefremov:
> To continue this discussion
> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/3540). What about adding
> TCP support for slcanpty? Otherwise one must have to use socat, so
> that 2 services are involved. I'd like to avoid his.
Yes thats a good Idea.