From: Daniele Segato <daniele.segato@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:39:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F3A358.5000807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130726190602.GC29799@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On 07/26/2013 09:06 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:33:01PM +0200, Daniele Segato wrote:
>
>> stress the difference between the two with suggestion on when the user
>> should use one in place of the other.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Segato <daniele.segato@gmail.com>
>
> The intent of your patch seems reasonable to me. There are a few minor
> language and typographical mistakes, and the patch itself is
> whitespace-damaged.
Hi Jeff,
thanks for the feedback, very appreciated.
But I don't understand what's wrong with the whitespaces.
Can you explain to me what's wrong and how I can avoid the issue?
I use thunderbird in text mode to send emails, should I use something
else? what?
>
> I also do not know that it is accurate to say "most git commands ignore
> lightweight tags". It is really only "naming" ones like "git describe".
>
> Here is a re-send of your patch with the fixups I would recommend.
>
Thanks, it's obviously better.
I'll send this new version as soon as you or someone else explain me how
to fix the whitespace damage.
> -- >8 --
> From: Daniele Segato <daniele.segato@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] docs/git-tag: explain lightweight versus annotated tags
>
> Stress the difference between the two with a suggestion on
> when the user should use one in place of the other.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Segato <daniele.segato@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> Documentation/git-tag.txt | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> index 22894cb..c418c44 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
> GnuPG key for signing. The configuration variable `gpg.program`
> is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
>
> +Tag objects (created with `-a`, `s`, or `-u`) are called "annotated"
> +tags; they contain a creation date, the tagger name and e-mail, a
> +tagging message, and an optional GnuPG signature. Whereas a
> +"lightweight" tag is simply a name for an object (usually a commit
> +object).
> +
> +Annotated tags are meant for release while lightweight tags are meant
> +for private or temporary object labels. For this reason, some git
> +commands for naming objects (like `git describe`) will ignore
> +lightweight tags by default.
> +
>
> OPTIONS
> -------
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-24 10:17 git tag usability issue: Lightweight vs Annotated confusion for the end user (ex. git describe default) Daniele Segato
2013-07-24 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-25 13:45 ` [PATCH] git-tag man: when to use lightweight or annotated tags Daniele Segato
2013-07-25 14:47 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-07-26 8:44 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 8:46 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 14:51 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-07-26 17:19 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 17:33 ` [PATCHv3] " Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 19:06 ` Jeff King
2013-07-26 19:36 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-07-29 18:02 ` Daniele Segato
2013-08-07 12:32 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 21:13 ` Marc Branchaud
2013-07-29 15:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-29 18:20 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-27 10:39 ` Daniele Segato [this message]
2013-07-27 11:26 ` Philip Oakley
2013-07-27 11:45 ` Stefan Beller
2013-07-29 18:16 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-26 21:13 ` [PATCH] " Marc Branchaud
2013-07-29 18:21 ` Daniele Segato
2013-07-25 13:48 ` git tag usability issue: Lightweight vs Annotated confusion for the end user (ex. git describe default) Daniele Segato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F3A358.5000807@gmail.com \
--to=daniele.segato@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=marcnarc@xiplink.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.