From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tracing: Shrink the size of struct ftrace_event_field
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:10:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F5CF04.6080306@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130727084528.GA6923@pd.tnic>
>>> static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, const char *type,
>>> const char *name, int offset, int size,
>>> int is_signed, int filter_type)
>>> @@ -120,13 +123,16 @@ static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, const char *type,
>>> field->type = type;
>>>
>>> if (filter_type == FILTER_OTHER)
>>> - field->filter_type = filter_assign_type(type);
>>> - else
>>> - field->filter_type = filter_type;
>>> + filter_type = filter_assign_type(type);
>>>
>>> + field->filter_type = filter_type;
>>> field->offset = offset;
>>> field->size = size;
>>> - field->is_signed = is_signed;
>>> + field->is_signed = !!is_signed;
>>> +
>>> + VERIFY_SIZE(filter_type);
>>> + VERIFY_SIZE(offset);
>>> + VERIFY_SIZE(size);
>
> Isn't this wrap-a-macro-with-another-more-obscure-macro not a bit too
> much?
>
> I mean,
> WARN_ON(filter_type > field->filter_type)
>
> is much more readable than VERIFY_SIZE IMO.
>
Oh, right. Using macro is a bit excessive here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-25 2:27 [PATCH 1/2][RESEND] tracing/syscalls: Annotate raw_init function with __init Li Zefan
2013-07-25 2:28 ` [PATCH 2/2][RESEND] tracing: Shrink the size of struct ftrace_event_field Li Zefan
2013-07-26 15:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-27 3:13 ` Li Zefan
2013-07-27 3:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " Li Zefan
2013-07-27 3:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-27 8:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-27 11:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-27 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-29 2:14 ` [PATCH v3 " Li Zefan
2013-07-29 2:10 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-07-26 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/2][RESEND] tracing/syscalls: Annotate raw_init function with __init Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F5CF04.6080306@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.