From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Rajnoha Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:44:36 +0200 Subject: Now I'm convinced about Linux In-Reply-To: <999744.9869.bm@smtp104.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <999744.9869.bm@smtp104.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <51F61D64.6070600@redhat.com> List-Id: To: lvm-devel@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/26/2013 06:37 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Having a simple problem today that last_rule would solve just fine and > finding that I must edit extra files or manage a packages file is You should not be pushed into editing udev rules unless you do something (very) extra. If something does not work correctly as expected, you should submit a bug report against the relevant distro/package. What exactly is the nature of the problem that needs such a manual intervention? Also, what udev rules are we talking about exactly? > quite convincing that they are right, especially the reason > "Inconsistent behaviour" when that is exactly what I expect to be able > to do on Unix and is so often made difficult just on Linux these days > and it seems especially in code mainly managed by RedHat, though I do > not a member of RedHat raising concerns about it. > > I have tried creating /lib/udev/rules.d/zzz-arsewipingidiotfix.rules > with LABEL="very_end" > > but adding GOTO="very_end" to earlier udev rules > (/etc/udev/rules.d/46-) is having no effect even after a udev restart? > > Any ideas? > Please, provide more information about the problem and if the problem is related to LVM, then provide the LVM version as well please Also, is this Fedora or RHEL or are you trying to use upstream version directly? Peter