From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33195)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1V3lMd-0007xU-3E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:11:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1V3lMW-0006fk-Hx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:11:43 -0400
Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=3993 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>) id 1V3lMW-0006dV-6W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:11:36 -0400
Message-ID: <51F64DEE.3070402@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:11:42 +0800
From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1374527256-27631-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>
	<51F63A21.6000903@redhat.com> <51F64B76.5060900@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <51F64B76.5060900@redhat.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] OptsVisitor: support / flatten integer
 ranges for repeating options
Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 07/29/2013 07:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/07/2013 11:47, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> On 07/22/13 23:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> rfc->v1:
>>> - addressed Paolo's comments for patches 1 and 2,
>>> - patches 7 and 8 are new (unit tests),
>>> - updated the cover letter to take native lists into account, plus
>>>   cleaned it up.
>>
>> Will this be considered for 1.7?
> 
> Yes, why not? :)

Nice, I'm rebasing my NUMA patch set on this series.

Thanks,
Wanlong Gao

> 
> Paolo
> 
>> I'm not sure how Wanlong's NUMA stuff is scheduled, but I think it
>> shouldn't wait for my series' acceptance. (Rebasing -numa range parsing
>> to rely on the new OptsVisitor "capability" shouldn't be hard -- it's
>> mostly removing "client" code.)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
> 
>