From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: omap5-uevm: fixup wrong regulator configuration Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: <51F66B65.4030702@ti.com> References: <1374079538-19548-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDb3Vzc29u?= , Tony Lindgren , benoit.cousson@gmail.com Cc: J Keerthy , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2013 04:57 AM, Keerthy wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 10:15 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Due to wrong older revision of documentation used as reference, we >> seem to have a bunch of LDOs wrongly configured on OMAP5 uEVM. This >> series is based power tree on production board 750-2628-XXX platform. >> Unfortunately, the wrong voltages may be detrimental to OMAP5 as they >> supply hardware blocks at voltages that are out of specification. > > This series looks good to me. > > Acked-by: J Keerthy Tony, Benoit - this series could prevent OMAP5 from being damaged on uEVMs with current 3.11 rc - could you suggest what we need to do to get it in? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:17:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: omap5-uevm: fixup wrong regulator configuration In-Reply-To: <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> References: <1374079538-19548-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> Message-ID: <51F66B65.4030702@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/29/2013 04:57 AM, Keerthy wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 10:15 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Due to wrong older revision of documentation used as reference, we >> seem to have a bunch of LDOs wrongly configured on OMAP5 uEVM. This >> series is based power tree on production board 750-2628-XXX platform. >> Unfortunately, the wrong voltages may be detrimental to OMAP5 as they >> supply hardware blocks at voltages that are out of specification. > > This series looks good to me. > > Acked-by: J Keerthy Tony, Benoit - this series could prevent OMAP5 from being damaged on uEVMs with current 3.11 rc - could you suggest what we need to do to get it in? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756053Ab3G2NRz (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:17:55 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:33040 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752914Ab3G2NRx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:17:53 -0400 Message-ID: <51F66B65.4030702@ti.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:17:25 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDb3Vzc29u?= , Tony Lindgren , CC: , , , , J Keerthy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: omap5-uevm: fixup wrong regulator configuration References: <1374079538-19548-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <51F63C74.6070503@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2013 04:57 AM, Keerthy wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 10:15 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Due to wrong older revision of documentation used as reference, we >> seem to have a bunch of LDOs wrongly configured on OMAP5 uEVM. This >> series is based power tree on production board 750-2628-XXX platform. >> Unfortunately, the wrong voltages may be detrimental to OMAP5 as they >> supply hardware blocks at voltages that are out of specification. > > This series looks good to me. > > Acked-by: J Keerthy Tony, Benoit - this series could prevent OMAP5 from being damaged on uEVMs with current 3.11 rc - could you suggest what we need to do to get it in? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon