From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on file pages
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:08:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F67777.6060609@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130726201807.GJ8661@moon>
On 07/27/2013 12:18 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Andy reported that if file page get reclaimed we loose soft-dirty bit
> if it was there, so save _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY bit when page address
> get encoded into pte entry. Thus when #pf happens on such non-present
> pte we can restore it back.
>
> Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> @@ -57,17 +57,25 @@ static int install_file_pte(struct mm_st
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long pgoff, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> int err = -ENOMEM;
> - pte_t *pte;
> + pte_t *pte, ptfile;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> pte = get_locked_pte(mm, addr, &ptl);
> if (!pte)
> goto out;
>
> - if (!pte_none(*pte))
> + ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
> +
> + if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
> + if (pte_present(*pte) &&
> + pte_soft_dirty(*pte))
I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_...,
since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case
and compiler would optimize this code out.
> + pte_file_mksoft_dirty(ptfile);
> +#endif
> zap_pte(mm, vma, addr, pte);
> + }
>
> - set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pgoff_to_pte(pgoff));
> + set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptfile);
> /*
> * We don't need to run update_mmu_cache() here because the "file pte"
> * being installed by install_file_pte() is not a real pte - it's a
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on file pages
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:08:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F67777.6060609@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130726201807.GJ8661@moon>
On 07/27/2013 12:18 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Andy reported that if file page get reclaimed we loose soft-dirty bit
> if it was there, so save _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY bit when page address
> get encoded into pte entry. Thus when #pf happens on such non-present
> pte we can restore it back.
>
> Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> @@ -57,17 +57,25 @@ static int install_file_pte(struct mm_st
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long pgoff, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> int err = -ENOMEM;
> - pte_t *pte;
> + pte_t *pte, ptfile;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> pte = get_locked_pte(mm, addr, &ptl);
> if (!pte)
> goto out;
>
> - if (!pte_none(*pte))
> + ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
> +
> + if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
> + if (pte_present(*pte) &&
> + pte_soft_dirty(*pte))
I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_...,
since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case
and compiler would optimize this code out.
> + pte_file_mksoft_dirty(ptfile);
> +#endif
> zap_pte(mm, vma, addr, pte);
> + }
>
> - set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pgoff_to_pte(pgoff));
> + set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptfile);
> /*
> * We don't need to run update_mmu_cache() here because the "file pte"
> * being installed by install_file_pte() is not a real pte - it's a
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 20:18 [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on file pages Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-26 20:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-26 20:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-26 20:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-26 21:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-26 21:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-26 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-26 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-27 6:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-27 6:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-27 17:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-27 17:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-07-27 21:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-27 21:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-27 19:29 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-27 19:29 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-28 9:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-28 9:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-29 14:08 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2013-07-29 14:08 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-29 14:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-29 14:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-29 14:24 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-29 14:24 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2013-07-29 14:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-29 14:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-29 14:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-29 14:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-29 15:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-29 15:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F67777.6060609@parallels.com \
--to=xemul@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.