Re: RFC regarding glimagesink

[Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>]

Thanks Rogerio,

On 07/29/2013 07:35 AM, Rogerio Nunes wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I've been usually working without X, so don't know much about glimagesink.
> I have some comments about bitbuck branches bellow.
>

Note that my testing was also without X.

> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Eric Nelson
> <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> <snip>
 >>
>> By the way, the attached patch is against branch fsl-0.10
>> in the Bitbucket tree, which appears to match up with the
>> Yocto build, but I notice that Jeremy has a patch applied
>> in the Yocto-0.10.
>>
>> Is 'fsl-0.10' the right baseline to use for future work?
>
> fsl-0.10 - branch with  "as is" code from fsl BSPs.
>
> yocto-0.10 - branch with patch(es) from the poky layer
>
> 0.10 - branch to merge fsl-0.10, yocto-0.10, upstream-0.10 and to
> refactor the code to port to master (still ongoing)
>

That's good to know.

Regards,


Eric