From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: kill unnecessary variable - csd_flags
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:46:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F71AEC.1090709@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130729121305.GE3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2013/7/29 20:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:29:45AM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> We used csd_flags formerly because we allocated csd_data by
>> kmalloc when "wait == 0". When fail to allocation, we will
>> fall back to on-stack allocation. "csd_data" might be invalid
>> after generic_exec_single return.
>>
>> But now we use per cpu data for single cpu ipi calls, and
>> csd_data can't fall back to on-stack allocation when "wait == 0".
>>
>> So csd_flags is unnecessary now. Remove it.
>
> The much simpler argument is that both callsites of
> generic_exec_single() do an unconditional csd_lock().
>
That's right. All csd_data are protected by csd_lock.
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/smp.c | 11 +----------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index 4dba0f7..cac2b6e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -186,25 +186,16 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
>>
>> while (!list_empty(&list)) {
>> struct call_single_data *csd;
>> - unsigned int csd_flags;
>>
>> csd = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list);
>> list_del(&csd->list);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * 'csd' can be invalid after this call if flags == 0
>> - * (when called through generic_exec_single()),
>> - * so save them away before making the call:
>> - */
>> - csd_flags = csd->flags;
>> -
>> csd->func(csd->info);
>>
>> /*
>> * Unlocked CSDs are valid through generic_exec_single():
>> */
>> - if (csd_flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
>> - csd_unlock(csd);
>> + csd_unlock(csd);
>
> The comment is completely useless and confusing after this; why do you
> leave it in?
>
Thanks for your comment, I'll remove the comment and send a new version soon.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 2:29 [PATCH] smp: kill unnecessary variable - csd_flags Xie XiuQi
2013-07-29 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 1:46 ` Xie XiuQi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F71AEC.1090709@huawei.com \
--to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.